RE: Collection of issues.

[Michael Latta]

Attached are my issues, and comments on the other issues raised by David and Fatima.  I have retained David and Fatima's numbering where I am commenting on their issues, and added my initials in parenthesis to theirs in those cases.  The actions, dates, and text are all my own.

 

Michael Latta

 

 

---

From: David Oliver [mailto:DOLI...@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 1:17 PM
To: Asmus Pandikow; Darold Smith; Diego R Tamburini; Erik Herzog; Fatma Dandashi; Georg Siebes; Howard Lykins; Ian Bailey; James N Martin; Jozef Bedocs; Mark Sampson; Michael Dickerson; Michael Latta; Mike T Loeffler; Peter Shames; Roger Burkhart; Russell Peak; Tim King; Tim Tritsch; Joseph Skipper
Subject: Collection of issues.

Gentlepersons,

 

In our last phine call and in subsequent E-mail we agreed to collect issues on Jan 6 bsending them to me. i committed to cutting them into the issues document. So far I havent received any issues in the requested format so that I can cut and paste them into a composite document.

 

I simply do not have the time to extract them from the many excellent comments, blogs, and reports that have been sent out. If i tried I would be sure to misrepresent your own intent.

 

Hope to recieve your issue statements by Jan 6. I have attached the draft format we discussed in the last phone call for the convenience of anyone who may have missed it.

 

Once we have an assembled sete of issues from reviewers we can begin E-mail and phone discussion of them as needed.

 

Dave Oliver

[Burkhart Roger M]

Attached is an issue on restrictions of elements within diagram types

that I had volunteered to submit during last month's discussions.

--Roger

[Dandashi, Fatma]

Michael,

with all due respect, I do not see why you had to take the issues I added, keep my name on them (albeit while adding your initials) and then provide your own take on them. even though you qualified this in your email, I got the impression these are my recommendations, and I aught to know better. that is, your write up now seems to indicate that I have voted to reject or accept certain things when this is really your own evaluation. please remove all references to me, and just keep the issue names and formatting, as I had done with the way I "reused" Dave's issues.

 

I understand it is Dave who will do the collating (unedited).

 

Dave,

I have submitted my evaluation to you, and as far as I am concerned, these are my technical responses to the issues I have identified.  I do not intend to participate in another round of re-interpretation of what I meant.

 

 

 

---

From: SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com [mailto:SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Latta
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 2:29 PM
To: 'David Oliver'; SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [SysML-Evaluators] RE: Collection of issues.

[Michael Latta]

Fatima,

 

I was attempting to provide input on the same issues, while making it easier to correlate input.  I apologize if this did not meet your desires.  Since you did much the same thing for David's issues I took this as setting a precedent for making his job easier by pre-correlating the issues.  The reason for including your initials was strictly an attempt to give proper credit as the original author of the issue, not the included text.  As you stated, I did everything possible to make my intentions clear both in the email and the document itself.

 

David,

 

Since she seems to object to my using her numbers and initials to identify when I am attempting to provide input on the same issue as she is raising, please accept the attached modified input which uses similar but new numbers and removes her initials.

 

Michael

 

 

 

---

From: SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com [mailto:SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dandashi, Fatma
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:01 PM
To: SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com; David Oliver
Subject: [SysML-Evaluators] Re: Collection of issues.

[Dandashi, Fatma]

thanks!

Fatma

---

From: SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com [mailto:SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Latta

Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 4:38 PM

[michael....@gm.com]

Hi all,

I've been lurking in the background in this evaluation but I do have two
issues that were noted by my GM Research colleagues based on earlier
revision of the submission, I think they still hold true in both of the
latest submissions.

(See attached file: Issues MDSD SysML MTL GM.doc)

---
Mike Loeffler - Global IT Leader | voice: +1 (586) 575-1025
GM Electrical, Controls & Software | fax: +1 (586) 492-5853
7000 Chicago Rd. | mailto:michael....@gm.com
Warren, MI 48090 | M/S: 480-202-270

[trth...@rockwellcollins.com]

Mike,
I am glad to see that you got something in. I have failed miserably but I
hope the onslaught has convinced the INCOSE to recommend to redo the
submissions.
maybe then I will get a chance to look at them.

I do believe we will have Peter's production_rules module in in time to
meet the wd2 timeline but I don't recall if it was still being included in
the configuration.

talk to you next week,
Tom
Thomas R. "Tom" Thurman
MS 108-105
Rockwell Collins Inc.
400 Collins Road N.E.
Cedar Rapids Ia, 52498, USA
phone:(319)295-2280
FAX:(319)295-2393
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient
and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or
use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other
person.

michael.loeffler@
gm.com
Sent by: To
SysML-Evaluators@ SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com
googlegroups.com cc

Subject
01/06/2006 04:43 [SysML-Evaluators] Collection of
PM issues.


Please respond to
SysML-Evaluators@
googlegroups.com

Hi all,

Warren, MI 48090 | M/S: 480-202-270[attachment "Issues
MDSD SysML MTL GM.doc" deleted by Thomas R
Thurman/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins]