Groups
Sign in
Groups
SysML-Evaluators
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
SysML-Evaluators
Contact owners and managers
1–30 of 67
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Russell Peak
1/27/06
SysML Merge Team formation - note to OMG SE DSIG from F. Waskiewicz
I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here
unread,
SysML Merge Team formation - note to OMG SE DSIG from F. Waskiewicz
I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here
1/27/06
Russell Peak
1/27/06
SysML Merge Team formation - notice to INCOSE Evaluators from D. Oliver
I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here
unread,
SysML Merge Team formation - notice to INCOSE Evaluators from D. Oliver
I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here
1/27/06
Dandashi, Fatma
, …
David Oliver
4
1/20/06
RE: [SysML-Evaluators] D Smith Comments
Darrold, I want to change the accept/reject items in issues 30.00 and 30.10. From the E-mail trail, i
unread,
RE: [SysML-Evaluators] D Smith Comments
Darrold, I want to change the accept/reject items in issues 30.00 and 30.10. From the E-mail trail, i
1/20/06
Smith, Darold
1/16/06
Update on Issue 30 & Comments on FlowItem and FlowPort
See the attachment for revision and added comments relevant to Issue 2 and Issue 3. Regards, Darold K
unread,
Update on Issue 30 & Comments on FlowItem and FlowPort
See the attachment for revision and added comments relevant to Issue 2 and Issue 3. Regards, Darold K
1/16/06
Joseph Skipper
1/12/06
Issues - J. F. Skipper
SysML Evaluators: My list of issues and comments are attached. Regards: JF Skipper Senior Engineer
unread,
Issues - J. F. Skipper
SysML Evaluators: My list of issues and comments are attached. Regards: JF Skipper Senior Engineer
1/12/06
Jeffrey A Estefan
1/11/06
[SysML-Evaluators] JPL Eval Team Position to INCOSE
SysML Evaluators, The attached document summarizes the JPL evaluation team's position directed to
unread,
[SysML-Evaluators] JPL Eval Team Position to INCOSE
SysML Evaluators, The attached document summarizes the JPL evaluation team's position directed to
1/11/06
Smith, Darold
,
Michael Latta
3
1/9/06
D Smith Comments
Michael, Glad to have you available on the evaluation as a third party observer with some solid UML
unread,
D Smith Comments
Michael, Glad to have you available on the evaluation as a third party observer with some solid UML
1/9/06
Michael Latta
, …
trth...@rockwellcollins.com
7
1/6/06
RE: Collection of issues.
Mike, I am glad to see that you got something in. I have failed miserably but I hope the onslaught
unread,
RE: Collection of issues.
Mike, I am glad to see that you got something in. I have failed miserably but I hope the onslaught
1/6/06
Erik Herzog
1/6/06
Comments on the requirements chapter
All, Please find an updated version of the review of the requirements chapter of the respective
unread,
Comments on the requirements chapter
All, Please find an updated version of the review of the requirements chapter of the respective
1/6/06
Diego Tamburini
1/6/06
Georgia Tech Issues Input
David, Attached are the issues from Georgia Tech. We used a priority index of 1 to 3: · Priority 1:
unread,
Georgia Tech Issues Input
David, Attached are the issues from Georgia Tech. We used a priority index of 1 to 3: · Priority 1:
1/6/06
Dandashi, Fatma
,
David Oliver
3
1/6/06
SysML evaluation
Dave, My own issues are included in the file I sent. but I also had "resolutions" to your
unread,
SysML evaluation
Dave, My own issues are included in the file I sent. but I also had "resolutions" to your
1/6/06
Erik Herzog
, …
Chonoles, Michael J
28
1/6/06
Clarification request DWO issue 1.00
Bran As far as I remember there is a minor difference between regular association and white diamond
unread,
Clarification request DWO issue 1.00
Bran As far as I remember there is a minor difference between regular association and white diamond
1/6/06
Russell Peak
12/30/05
RE: [SysML-Evaluators] on SysML parametrics: intent and examples
Folks, Updated SysML parametrics examples are available here: http://www.pslm.gatech.edu/topics/sysml
unread,
RE: [SysML-Evaluators] on SysML parametrics: intent and examples
Folks, Updated SysML parametrics examples are available here: http://www.pslm.gatech.edu/topics/sysml
12/30/05
Smith, Darold
12/29/05
Instance Representations of SE Processes
All, Attached is a PPT file with a couple of examples that are candidates for SysML representation.
unread,
Instance Representations of SE Processes
All, Attached is a PPT file with a couple of examples that are candidates for SysML representation.
12/29/05
Jeffrey A Estefan
,
Dandashi, Fatma
2
12/29/05
[SysML-Evaluators] Model-Based Engineering vs. Model-Driven Design?
Dear SysML Evaluators, I have not found one publication that calls out the distinction between model-
unread,
[SysML-Evaluators] Model-Based Engineering vs. Model-Driven Design?
Dear SysML Evaluators, I have not found one publication that calls out the distinction between model-
12/29/05
Russell Peak
,
Cris Kobryn
4
12/22/05
adding team presentations to group archive
Folks, I have added the SST overview slides (2005-12-19) onto this website for reference and
unread,
adding team presentations to group archive
Folks, I have added the SST overview slides (2005-12-19) onto this website for reference and
12/22/05
Michael Latta
12/22/05
Update to blog
I have updated my blog with an entry following issues on the last call. This includes a write-up on
unread,
Update to blog
I have updated my blog with an entry following issues on the last call. This includes a write-up on
12/22/05
Jeffrey A Estefan
,
Michael Latta
2
12/21/05
[SysML-Evaluators] Soliciting Input on Instance Diagram Issue
Jeff, I will provide input on the issue. I do however on principal object to any private collection
unread,
[SysML-Evaluators] Soliciting Input on Instance Diagram Issue
Jeff, I will provide input on the issue. I do however on principal object to any private collection
12/21/05
trth...@rockwellcollins.com
12/21/05
Thomas R Thurman/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 12/20/2005 and will not return until 01/04/2006. I will respond
unread,
Thomas R Thurman/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 12/20/2005 and will not return until 01/04/2006. I will respond
12/21/05
Howard...@ee.doe.gov
12/21/05
MDSD UML 2.0 RFI Response from December, 1999
All, Attached is the INCOSE Model Driven System Design group's response to the Request for
unread,
MDSD UML 2.0 RFI Response from December, 1999
All, Attached is the INCOSE Model Driven System Design group's response to the Request for
12/21/05
Michael Latta
12/20/05
New blog entry
I have a new blog entry of interest to this group. http://spaces.msn.com/members/michaellatta As I
unread,
New blog entry
I have a new blog entry of interest to this group. http://spaces.msn.com/members/michaellatta As I
12/20/05
Michael Latta
2
12/20/05
RE: [Fwd: [SysML-Evaluators] Re: FW: Requirements Management]
I just had an idea for a way to get closer to what would be ideal while living with the UML and
unread,
RE: [Fwd: [SysML-Evaluators] Re: FW: Requirements Management]
I just had an idea for a way to get closer to what would be ideal while living with the UML and
12/20/05
Michael Latta
, …
David Oliver
4
12/19/05
Process Question
Fatima, I have sent a cude draft of a manner to collect issues from reviewers. I expect us to discus
unread,
Process Question
Fatima, I have sent a cude draft of a manner to collect issues from reviewers. I expect us to discus
12/19/05
David Oliver
12/19/05
Fw: [SysML-Evaluators] Another view of "parsimony"
The following inserts are my own opinion about this: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas
unread,
Fw: [SysML-Evaluators] Another view of "parsimony"
The following inserts are my own opinion about this: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas
12/19/05
Jeffrey A Estefan
12/19/05
[SysML-Evaluators] Part III of IV Review - J. A. Estefan
SysML Evaluators, Attached is the third of four review documents (in Adobe PDF format) that reflects
unread,
[SysML-Evaluators] Part III of IV Review - J. A. Estefan
SysML Evaluators, Attached is the third of four review documents (in Adobe PDF format) that reflects
12/19/05
Smith, Darold
,
Michael Latta
2
12/16/05
FW: Requirements Management
Darold, Thank you for your comments. I agree that it would be far better to have the requirements
unread,
FW: Requirements Management
Darold, Thank you for your comments. I agree that it would be far better to have the requirements
12/16/05
Russell Peak
,
Michael Latta
4
12/16/05
on SysML parametrics: intent and examples
I am afraid we may need to respectfully disagree on this. Your examples keep coming back to
unread,
on SysML parametrics: intent and examples
I am afraid we may need to respectfully disagree on this. Your examples keep coming back to
12/16/05
Thomas Weigert
, …
Russell Peak
11
12/16/05
Another view of "parsimony"
Please reply to this parametrics discussion under this new topic thread: From: Russell Peak Sent:
unread,
Another view of "parsimony"
Please reply to this parametrics discussion under this new topic thread: From: Russell Peak Sent:
12/16/05
Erik Herzog
12/16/05
RE: [SysML-Evaluators] Review of requirements chapters in both submissions
Sandy, All, Some clarifications to my previous comments on requirements chapters in both submission
unread,
RE: [SysML-Evaluators] Review of requirements chapters in both submissions
Sandy, All, Some clarifications to my previous comments on requirements chapters in both submission
12/16/05
Michael Latta
12/15/05
Blog updates
There are new updates on my blog that would be of interest to this list. http://spaces.msn.com/
unread,
Blog updates
There are new updates on my blog that would be of interest to this list. http://spaces.msn.com/
12/15/05