Groups

SysML-Evaluators

1–30 of 67

0 selected

1/27/06

SysML Merge Team formation - note to OMG SE DSIG from F. Waskiewicz

I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here

unread,

SysML Merge Team formation - note to OMG SE DSIG from F. Waskiewicz

I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here

1/27/06

1/27/06

SysML Merge Team formation - notice to INCOSE Evaluators from D. Oliver

I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here

unread,

SysML Merge Team formation - notice to INCOSE Evaluators from D. Oliver

I am forwarding two important notes to SysML-Ev...@googlegroups.com for the group record. Here

1/27/06

Dandashi, Fatma, … David Oliver4

1/20/06

RE: [SysML-Evaluators] D Smith Comments

Darrold, I want to change the accept/reject items in issues 30.00 and 30.10. From the E-mail trail, i

unread,

RE: [SysML-Evaluators] D Smith Comments

Darrold, I want to change the accept/reject items in issues 30.00 and 30.10. From the E-mail trail, i

1/20/06

1/16/06

Update on Issue 30 & Comments on FlowItem and FlowPort

See the attachment for revision and added comments relevant to Issue 2 and Issue 3. Regards, Darold K

unread,

Update on Issue 30 & Comments on FlowItem and FlowPort

See the attachment for revision and added comments relevant to Issue 2 and Issue 3. Regards, Darold K

1/16/06

1/12/06

Issues - J. F. Skipper

SysML Evaluators: My list of issues and comments are attached. Regards: JF Skipper Senior Engineer

unread,

Issues - J. F. Skipper

SysML Evaluators: My list of issues and comments are attached. Regards: JF Skipper Senior Engineer

1/12/06

Jeffrey A Estefan

1/11/06

[SysML-Evaluators] JPL Eval Team Position to INCOSE

SysML Evaluators, The attached document summarizes the JPL evaluation team's position directed to

unread,

[SysML-Evaluators] JPL Eval Team Position to INCOSE

SysML Evaluators, The attached document summarizes the JPL evaluation team's position directed to

1/11/06

Smith, Darold, Michael Latta3

1/9/06

D Smith Comments

Michael, Glad to have you available on the evaluation as a third party observer with some solid UML

unread,

D Smith Comments

Michael, Glad to have you available on the evaluation as a third party observer with some solid UML

1/9/06

Michael Latta, … trth...@rockwellcollins.com7

1/6/06

RE: Collection of issues.

Mike, I am glad to see that you got something in. I have failed miserably but I hope the onslaught

unread,

RE: Collection of issues.

Mike, I am glad to see that you got something in. I have failed miserably but I hope the onslaught

1/6/06

1/6/06

Comments on the requirements chapter

All, Please find an updated version of the review of the requirements chapter of the respective

unread,

Comments on the requirements chapter

All, Please find an updated version of the review of the requirements chapter of the respective

1/6/06

Diego Tamburini

1/6/06

Georgia Tech Issues Input

David, Attached are the issues from Georgia Tech. We used a priority index of 1 to 3: · Priority 1:

unread,

Georgia Tech Issues Input

David, Attached are the issues from Georgia Tech. We used a priority index of 1 to 3: · Priority 1:

1/6/06

Dandashi, Fatma, David Oliver3

1/6/06

SysML evaluation

Dave, My own issues are included in the file I sent. but I also had "resolutions" to your

unread,

SysML evaluation

Dave, My own issues are included in the file I sent. but I also had "resolutions" to your

1/6/06

Erik Herzog, … Chonoles, Michael J28

1/6/06

Clarification request DWO issue 1.00

Bran As far as I remember there is a minor difference between regular association and white diamond

unread,

Clarification request DWO issue 1.00

Bran As far as I remember there is a minor difference between regular association and white diamond

1/6/06

12/30/05

RE: [SysML-Evaluators] on SysML parametrics: intent and examples

Folks, Updated SysML parametrics examples are available here: http://www.pslm.gatech.edu/topics/sysml

unread,

RE: [SysML-Evaluators] on SysML parametrics: intent and examples

Folks, Updated SysML parametrics examples are available here: http://www.pslm.gatech.edu/topics/sysml

12/30/05

12/29/05

Instance Representations of SE Processes

All, Attached is a PPT file with a couple of examples that are candidates for SysML representation.

unread,

Instance Representations of SE Processes

All, Attached is a PPT file with a couple of examples that are candidates for SysML representation.

12/29/05

Jeffrey A Estefan, Dandashi, Fatma2

12/29/05

[SysML-Evaluators] Model-Based Engineering vs. Model-Driven Design?

Dear SysML Evaluators, I have not found one publication that calls out the distinction between model-

unread,

[SysML-Evaluators] Model-Based Engineering vs. Model-Driven Design?

Dear SysML Evaluators, I have not found one publication that calls out the distinction between model-

12/29/05

Russell Peak, Cris Kobryn4

12/22/05

adding team presentations to group archive

Folks, I have added the SST overview slides (2005-12-19) onto this website for reference and

unread,

adding team presentations to group archive

Folks, I have added the SST overview slides (2005-12-19) onto this website for reference and

12/22/05

12/22/05

I have updated my blog with an entry following issues on the last call. This includes a write-up on

unread,

I have updated my blog with an entry following issues on the last call. This includes a write-up on

12/22/05

Jeffrey A Estefan, Michael Latta2

12/21/05

[SysML-Evaluators] Soliciting Input on Instance Diagram Issue

Jeff, I will provide input on the issue. I do however on principal object to any private collection

unread,

[SysML-Evaluators] Soliciting Input on Instance Diagram Issue

Jeff, I will provide input on the issue. I do however on principal object to any private collection

12/21/05

trth...@rockwellcollins.com

12/21/05

Thomas R Thurman/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 12/20/2005 and will not return until 01/04/2006. I will respond

unread,

Thomas R Thurman/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 12/20/2005 and will not return until 01/04/2006. I will respond

12/21/05

Howard...@ee.doe.gov

12/21/05

MDSD UML 2.0 RFI Response from December, 1999

All, Attached is the INCOSE Model Driven System Design group's response to the Request for

unread,

MDSD UML 2.0 RFI Response from December, 1999

All, Attached is the INCOSE Model Driven System Design group's response to the Request for

12/21/05

12/20/05

I have a new blog entry of interest to this group. http://spaces.msn.com/members/michaellatta As I

unread,

I have a new blog entry of interest to this group. http://spaces.msn.com/members/michaellatta As I

12/20/05

12/20/05

RE: [Fwd: [SysML-Evaluators] Re: FW: Requirements Management]

I just had an idea for a way to get closer to what would be ideal while living with the UML and

unread,

RE: [Fwd: [SysML-Evaluators] Re: FW: Requirements Management]

I just had an idea for a way to get closer to what would be ideal while living with the UML and

12/20/05

Michael Latta, … David Oliver4

12/19/05

Process Question

Fatima, I have sent a cude draft of a manner to collect issues from reviewers. I expect us to discus

unread,

Process Question

Fatima, I have sent a cude draft of a manner to collect issues from reviewers. I expect us to discus

12/19/05

12/19/05

Fw: [SysML-Evaluators] Another view of "parsimony"

The following inserts are my own opinion about this: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas

unread,

Fw: [SysML-Evaluators] Another view of "parsimony"

The following inserts are my own opinion about this: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas

12/19/05

Jeffrey A Estefan

12/19/05

[SysML-Evaluators] Part III of IV Review - J. A. Estefan

SysML Evaluators, Attached is the third of four review documents (in Adobe PDF format) that reflects

unread,

[SysML-Evaluators] Part III of IV Review - J. A. Estefan

SysML Evaluators, Attached is the third of four review documents (in Adobe PDF format) that reflects

12/19/05

Smith, Darold, Michael Latta2

12/16/05

FW: Requirements Management

Darold, Thank you for your comments. I agree that it would be far better to have the requirements

unread,

FW: Requirements Management

Darold, Thank you for your comments. I agree that it would be far better to have the requirements

12/16/05

Russell Peak, Michael Latta4

12/16/05

on SysML parametrics: intent and examples

I am afraid we may need to respectfully disagree on this. Your examples keep coming back to

unread,

on SysML parametrics: intent and examples

I am afraid we may need to respectfully disagree on this. Your examples keep coming back to

12/16/05

Thomas Weigert, … Russell Peak11

12/16/05

Another view of "parsimony"

Please reply to this parametrics discussion under this new topic thread: From: Russell Peak Sent:

unread,

Another view of "parsimony"

Please reply to this parametrics discussion under this new topic thread: From: Russell Peak Sent:

12/16/05

12/16/05

RE: [SysML-Evaluators] Review of requirements chapters in both submissions

Sandy, All, Some clarifications to my previous comments on requirements chapters in both submission

unread,

RE: [SysML-Evaluators] Review of requirements chapters in both submissions

Sandy, All, Some clarifications to my previous comments on requirements chapters in both submission

12/16/05

12/15/05

There are new updates on my blog that would be of interest to this list. http://spaces.msn.com/

unread,

There are new updates on my blog that would be of interest to this list. http://spaces.msn.com/

12/15/05

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu