What Obama’s Admin Told Trump’s Admin About South Sudan Conflict

[Elisabeth Janaina]

What Obama’s Admin Told Trump’s Admin About South Sudan Conflict
Leave a comment
Donald Booth, US Special Envoy for Sudan and South Sudan (Photo: file)

Donald Booth, US Special Envoy for Sudan and South Sudan (Photo: file)

Jan 22, 2017(Nyamilepedia) —– The United States Special Envoy to Sudan
and South Sudan, Amb. Donald Booth, who has also served as US
ambassador to Liberia(2005 – 2008), Zambia(2008-2010) and
Ethiopia(2008-2013) briefed the next administration, media and
representatives on the situation in Sudan and South Sudan on 18th of
January, 2017 before stepping down.

Amb. Booth, who has served for both Republicans under President George
W. Bush and Democrats under President Barack Obama, has wealth of
knowledge on the two Sudans extending to early 1980s when he served as
desk officer for Sudan before the SPLM/SPLA rebellion broke out in
1983.

Amb. Booth gave in-depth briefing ranging from the root causes of
conflicts in the two Sudans to recommendations on how to amicably
resolve Sudan and South Sudan internal conflicts in the future.

Below is a summary on South Sudan from his public briefing at the
United States Institute of Peace on January 18, 2017.
ROOT CAUSES OF SOUTH SUDAN CONFLICT.

Lack of institutional foundation on which to build a stable modern state
People of South Sudan never had an opportunity to forge a united
national VISION.
Leaders struggled to make a transition from an insurgent to governing class.
Future leaders with the sense of entitlement and focused on
securing wealth, not state building

When Donald Booth Arrived in August 2013

When Donald Booth arrived in Juba in August 2013, all the critical
initiatives that would have laid the foundation of South Sudan were
falling apart and signs of state failure were becoming more visible
each day.

“Two years after independent, we saw critical initiatives such as
drafting a permanent constitution, pursuing reconciliation and
implementing economic reforms drifting and stalling;

“Mean while the influence and authority of security organs were expanding;

“The root causes of South Sudan conflict were already manifest by the
summer of 2013, indeed they had been present even before the
independent for times they had been paved over by shared goal of
independent but they were always there” Amb. Booth Said.

The proliferation of militias, inter-communal animosity and bloodshed,
conflict in Jonglei state, tension over the border and political
instability at the centre were on the rise by the time Donald Booth
began the job in August of 2013.

“The root causes of South Sudan conflict were already manifested
by the Summer of 2013” he said.

Unlike many intellectuals and observers like Donald Booth, president
Salva Kiir and his supporters who underestimated the signs of a full
scale conflict called it a coup when it broke out in December that
year.
The Rise of Dictatorship and Ethnic Targeting of the Nuer

Amb. Booth recognizes that President Salva Kiir became too tyrannical
toward December and in his position he tried to eliminate his
opponents to consolidate power; followed by ethnic targeting of the
Nuer to escalate the struggle among the presidential guards.

“So too was the eagerness of president Kiir to eliminate
alternative point of view[Riek Machar et al] and consolidate his own
power” Booth said.

“The July 2013 dismissal of the cabinet and the firing of Vice
President, Riek Machar, jolted [shook] the country;

“In December, when President Kiir took steps to tighten his grip on
the Sudan People Liberation Movement [SPLM – the ruling party],
followed by a struggle in the presidential guards, followed by
targeted killing of Nuer in Juba and that triggered the civil conflict
that continue today”Amb. Booth spoke in a briefing that was also
attended by Dr. Machar’s wife, Angelina Teny, and other
representatives from the government side and as well as from SPLM/SPLA
in Opposition
Future Negotiations

Amb. Booth acknowledged that attempts by IGAD countries to negotiate
South Sudan peace process failed because the South Sudanese leaders
were not willing to compromise.

“But South Sudan leaders were not interested in compromises, so talks
dragged on despite numerous IGAD summits, I think 9 in total during
the period of negotiations” Both Said.

In addition, the regional leaders were divided, fighting for their own
interests. As a result an IGAD-Plus that comprised of IGAD Countries,
five other African countries representing each of the five regions of
Africa, TROIKA(US, UK and Norway), China and European Union was
formed.

“The IGAD-Plus was there to bring a greater pressure to bear on South
Sudan leaders to achieve peace;

“I mentioned all these because I would argue that the future diplomacy
towards South Sudan is going to require a similar complicated mixture
of regional and international efforts with the United States at the
forefront” Amb. Booth explains.
FAILURES OF THE UNITED STATES AND PARTNERS

Amb. Booth acknowledge that the United States and partners failed to
restore peace in South Sudan. He believes that IGAD and IGAD-Plus all
failed because they underestimated South Sudan’s problem and made
wrong assumptions.

“Let me also say this, we have made mistakes, the events of the last
six months have shown that we and the region have placed too much
faith that Salva Kiir and Riek Machar could peacefully share power”
Booth regrets.

“At certain point we have overestimated the power we had on South
Sudan political leaders;

“I wish we had taken steps earlier to forge an international consensus
on the need for arms embargo to stem the flow of weapons into South
Sudan;

“Fundamentally, I believe we in the United States wanted peace for
South Sudan far more than its leaders did, and like the people of
South Sudan we have been unable to ensure that the interests of
unarmed civilian populations are valued more than those of the leaders
who are empowered by personal arm forces” Donald Booth regrets that
the US and partners failed the innocent people of South Sudan.
DO NOT DISCARD THE PEACE DOCUMENT, ARCISS

Despite that South Sudan agreement has collapsed, Amb. Booth believes
that the peace document, the Agreement on Resolution of South Sudan
Conflict, should not be discarded because it has many good reforms and
other fundamentals that are necessary to reform the young African
state, South Sudan.

“Given subsequent events, however, I recognize that there is
temptation now to discard the agreement, I would strongly caution
against that;

“It’s really is more than an agreement between companions, it is a
blueprint for reforming the South Sudanese state; one that remains as
valid as ever, its provision to install in one of the world’s least
developed countries important constitutional, economic, security and
justice reforms and institutions;

“The agreement requires that the companions who signed it avoid
violent long enough for these reforms to be agreed upon and
implemented, sadly that did not happened.” Donald Booth said.
PEACE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION NOT UNDERWAY

Although Salva Kiir government in Juba severally announced that the
Peace Agreement is being implemented, Special Envoy Booth and his
partners understand that there is no functioning ceasefire in the
country and no reforms are being implemented in South Sudan.

“I recognize that at presence, there is no functional ceasefire, the
government is not representative of all South Sudan political
factions, and there is no serious work underway on reforms but these
remain worthy goals;

“I would argue that the agreement is not halt of accomplishment, it
remains the point of references by both the government and the
opposition, and we should continue to encourage a return to the
foundation of that agreement and we should be presence when the
conditions shift to allow for sincere implementation” Donald Booth
said.
WHAT THE UNITED STATES HAS ACHIEVED IN SOUTH SUDAN

The United States maintained its in South Sudan even at most
dangerous and difficult times.
Continued to push for political agreements that would allowed
cessation of hostilities to hold.
Spearheaded fundraising among donors to support key institutions
of the peace agreement.
Organized the International Community to help step off economic disaster.
Led International Community response to humanitarian crises,
latest estimate is 7 millions people in need of emergency food help.
US responded with USD 1.9 billion dollars in emergency
humanitarian assistance since the beginning of the conflict.

Recommendations to Trump Administration

Continue efforts to push the African Union towards establishment
of a hybrid court for South Sudan to achieve accountability for
crimes committed during the conflict including the widespread and
shocking sexual violence
To base any support for future DDR [disarmament demobilisation and
reintegration] efforts on a realistic and affordable end-state for
South Sudan security sector – South Sudan has been an over militarized
state since its inception and that needs to change.
To press for reforms of the structures of the state through
transparence and coherence constitutional drafting process
Make the reform of public financial management a precondition for
future financial support for South Sudan development.

ON SANCTIONS AND ARMS EMBARGO

The Situation that let us to seek an arm embargo and sanctions at
the United Nations Security Council in December has not improved since
our failure to secure passage to that resolution
Encourage the next administration to continue to examine seriously
what we can do to incentivise the parties to choose a better path
forwards.

To be continued …..