I share the outrage expressed in the British press over the
treatment of our naval personnel accused by Iran of illegally entering their
waters. It is a disgrace. We
would never dream of treating captives like this - allowing them to smoke cigarettes, for example, even
though it has been proven that smoking kills. And as for
compelling poor servicewoman Faye Turney to wear a black headscarf, and then allowing
the picture to be posted around the world - have the Iranians no concept of
civilised behaviour?For God's sake, what's wrong
with putting a bag over her head? That's what we do with the Muslims we capture:
we put bags over their heads, so it's hard to breathe. Then it's perfectly
acceptable to take photographs of them and circulate them to the press because
the captives can't be recognised and humiliated in the way these unfortunate
British service people are.
It is also unacceptable that these British captives
should be made to talk on television and say things that they may regret later.
If the Iranians put duct tape over their mouths, like we do
to our captives, they wouldn't be able to talk at all. Of course they'd
probably find it even harder to breathe - especially with a bag over their head
- but at least they wouldn't be humiliated.
And what's all this about allowing the captives to
write letters home saying they are all right? It's time the
Iranians fell into line with the rest of the civilised world:
they should allow their
captives the privacy of solitary confinement. That's one of the many privileges
the US grants to its captives in Guantánamo Bay.
The true mark of a civilised
country is that it doesn't rush into charging people whom it has arbitrarily
arrested in places it's just invaded. The inmates of
Guantánamo, for example, have been
enjoying all the privacy they want for almost five years, and
the first inmate has only just been charged. What a contrast to the disgraceful
Iranian rush to parade their captives before the cameras!
What's more, it is clear that the
Iranians are not giving their British prisoners any decent physical
exercise.The US military make sure
that their Iraqi captives enjoy PT. This takes the form of exciting "stress
positions", which the captives are expected to hold for hours on end so as to
improve their stomach and calf muscles. A common exercise is where they are made
to stand on the balls of their feet and then squat so that their thighs are
parallel to the ground. This creates intense pain and, finally, muscle
failure.It's
all good healthy fun and has the bonus that the captives will confess to
anything to get out of it.
And this brings me to my final point. It is clear from her TV
appearance that servicewoman Turney has been put under pressure. The newspapers
have persuaded behavioural psychologists to examine the footage and they all
conclude that she is "unhappy and stressed".
What is so appalling is the
underhand way in which the Iranians have got her "unhappy and stressed".
She shows no signs of electrocution or burn marks and
there are no signs of beating on her face. This is unacceptable.If captives are to be put under duress, such as by
forcing them into compromising sexual positions, or having electric shocks to
their genitals, they should be photographed, as they were in Abu Ghraib.
The photographs should then be circulated around the civilised
world so that everyone can see exactly what has been going on.
As Stephen Glover pointed out in the Daily Mail, perhaps it would not be right to bomb Iran in retaliation for the
humiliation of our servicemen, but
clearly the Iranian people must be made to suffer - whether by
beefing up sanctions, as the Mail suggests, or
simply by getting President Bush to hurry up and invade, as he intends to
anyway, and bring democracy and western values to the country, as he has in
Iraq.