Re: Interim Mission Controls Update. It is only three months to the election. Please let the voters decide.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert R. Tillman

unread,
Jul 29, 2015, 10:09:38 PM7/29/15
to Flores, Claudia (CPC), to...@kermanmorris.com, la...@badinerurbanplanning.com, o...@emeraldfund.com, se...@sjkdev.com, in...@agicapital.com, aju...@reubenlaw.com, SVe...@fbm.com, phn...@msn.com, bglad...@hansonbridgett.com, w.sc...@forumdesign.com, jocon...@gmail.com, David Silverman, Melissa L. Vancrum, lin...@podell.com, ni...@podell.com, Stacy Norman, Sonja Trauss, Brooke Segaran, t...@sfhac.org, Kristy Wang, Theo Oliphant, Alexis M. Pelosi, Muhammad Nadhiri (mnadhiri@axisdevgroup.com), Sarah Karlinsky, Rodgers, AnMarie (CPC), Rahaim, John (CPC), Kelley, Gil (CPC), Kathrin Moore, Johnson, Christine (CPC), Rich Hillis, Michael Antonini, Cindy Wu, Rodney Fong, Richards, Dennis (CPC)
Dear Claudia,

Thank you. I will be traveling abroad from August 2nd through August 14th and so will not be able to attend the August 6th meeting.

Given that the Mission Moratorium Ballot Initiative will be on the November ballot and that both pro and anti-development groups have strongly opposed the proposed Mission Interim Controls, I do not think that such controls are necessary at all. If the Ballot Initiative passes, then the Mission Interim Controls are moot, as the Ballot Initiative will shut down all development covered by the Interim Mission Controls. If the Ballot Initiative passes, then the San Francisco voters will have expressed a clear preference for development to proceed, and the Planning Commission should respect their wishes. In either case, the Mission Interim Controls are unnecessary. Their only result is to occupy the valuable time of the Planning Commission and of all concerned parties and to create unnecessary expense for everyone. In the last meeting on this subject, I heard several Planning Commissioners express concerns regarding the arbitrary nature of such controls and regarding the difficulty of applying such controls fairly. Why struggle with these issues for no reason?

I expect that the Mission Moratorium Ballot Initiative will be very hard fought. I do not see the Mission Interim Controls as impacting that fight in any significant respect. I suggest that we all get out of the way of that fight.

It is only three months to the election. Please let the voters decide

Sincerely,

Bob

Robert R. Tillman
RRTI, Inc.
14 Sunshine Ave.
Sausalito, CA 94965
415-332-9242 Telephone



From: Claudia Flores <claudia...@sfgov.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 6:30 PM
To: "E. Toby Morris" <to...@kermanmorris.com>, Lawrence Badiner <la...@badinerurbanplanning.com>, "o...@emeraldfund.com" <o...@emeraldfund.com>, "se...@sjkdev.com" <se...@sjkdev.com>, "in...@agicapital.com" <in...@agicapital.com>, "aju...@reubenlaw.com" <aju...@reubenlaw.com>, "Steven L. Vettel" <sve...@fbm.com>, "Philip F. Lesser" <phn...@msn.com>, "M. Brett Gladstone" <bglad...@hansonbridgett.com>, "w.sc...@forumdesign.com" <w.sc...@forumdesign.com>, "se...@sjkdev.com" <se...@sjkdev.com>, "jocon...@gmail.com" <jocon...@gmail.com>, David Silverman <dsilv...@reubenlaw.com>, "Melissa L. Vancrum" <MVan...@hansonbridgett.com>, "lin...@podell.com" <lin...@podell.com>, "ni...@podell.com" <ni...@podell.com>, "Robert R. Tillman" <rr...@pacbell.net>, Stacy Norman <sno...@agiavant.com>, Sonja Trauss <sonja....@gmail.com>, Brooke Segaran <bseg...@gmail.com>, Tim Cohen <t...@sfhac.org>, Kristy Wang <kw...@spur.org>, Lawrence Badiner <la...@badinerurbanplanning.com>, "Theo F. Oliphant" <toli...@axisdevgroup.com>, "Alexis M. Pelosi" <ale...@pelosilawgroup.com>, "Muhammad A. Nadhiri" <mnad...@axisdevgroup.com>, Sarah Karlinsky <skarl...@spur.org>
Cc: "Rodgers, AnMarie (CPC)" <anmarie...@sfgov.org>, John Rahaim <john....@sfgov.org>, "Kelley, Gil (CPC)" <gil.k...@sfgov.org>
Subject: RE: interim controls update

Hi all,
 
Attached is the draft packet for the Commission’s August 6th hearing. I just need to  Attach Exhibits A and B (the map and projects with minor corrections) but you have seen those from the previous two packets.
 
Let us know if there are any questions.
 
Claudia
 
 
Claudia Flores
 
Planning Department│City and County of San Francisco
1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94103
Direct: 415-558-6473│Fax: 415-558-6409
             
 
 
_____________________________________________
From: Rodgers, AnMarie (CPC)
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:18 PM
To: Rahaim, John (CPC); Flores, Claudia (CPC); to...@kermanmorris.com; la...@badinerurbanplanning.com; o...@emeraldfund.com; se...@sjkdev.com; in...@agicapital.com; aju...@reubenlaw.com; SVe...@fbm.com; phn...@msn.com; bglad...@hansonbridgett.com; w.sc...@forumdesign.com; Sucre, Richard (CPC); Vu, Doug (CPC); se...@sjkdev.com; jocon...@gmail.com
Cc: Melissa L. Vancrum; lin...@podell.com; ni...@podell.com; Robert R. Tillman; Stacy Norman
Subject: RE: CONFIRMED - Meeting w/John Rahaim
 
 
Thanks again for coming today. Attached is the final “Housing Balance” report.  We expect there will be much dialog about this report in the next few months.
 
<< File: 20150706_HousingBalance.pdf >>
AnMarie Rodgers
Senior Policy Advisor
 
Planning Department│City and County of San Francisco
1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94103
Direct: 415
.558.6395│Fax: 415.558.6409
 
 
-----Original Appointment-----
From: Rahaim, John (CPC)
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 3:49 PM
To: Rahaim, John (CPC); Rodgers, AnMarie (CPC); Flores, Claudia (CPC); to...@kermanmorris.com; la...@badinerurbanplanning.com; o...@emeraldfund.com; se...@sjkdev.com; in...@agicapital.com; aju...@reubenlaw.com; SVe...@fbm.com; phn...@msn.com; bglad...@hansonbridgett.com; w.sc...@forumdesign.com; Sucre, Richard (CPC); Vu, Doug (CPC)
Cc: Melissa L. Vancrum; lin...@podell.com; ni...@podell.com; Robert R. Tillman; Stacy Norman
Subject: CONFIRMED - Meeting w/John Rahaim
When: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Where: CPC_528-1650 Mission (16)
 
 
Dear all,
 
Please save this date to discuss a proposal for interim controls in the Mission that will be in front of the Planning Commission on July 9th for their consideration. If adopted, the proposed interim controls would be in place for six months, adding heightened scrutiny to certain development projects during this period.  Unlike the moratorium which would have placed a temporary hold on most development, the draft interim controls would enable projects to move forward, but would apply added scrutiny.  As you know, housing affordability is a critical issue currently, and, therefore, I feel it is important to make explicit the level of increased scrutiny that would be applied.
 
The full proposal will be posted on the calendar at the end of the day today and is attached to this email. If you can’t make this date, please send your availability for the next couple of weeks. While the Commission would consider initiation on July 9, the earliest interim controls could be adopted would be July 23.
 
John
 
 
<< File: 2015-000988CWP_Mission2015Interim.pdf >>
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages