Tests and tul loader...
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Jimmy Alison Jørgensen
Sep 13, 2009, 10:45:27 PM9/13/09
to robwor...@googlegroups.com
Hey,
I’ve been trying to figure out why most of our unit tests fail. It seems to relate to loading TUL scenes. I have currently removed (commented out) the code snippets that was to blame, though i think we should decide what to do with the TUL loader. It is in my opinion deprecated and should be removed from RobWork, possibly placed in rwlibs or rwapp.
What do you think?
Med venlig hilsen
Jimmy Alison Jørgensen
Ph.d.-studerende, Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Instituttet
|
Tlf. |
6550 3548 |
|
Fax |
6550 3681 |
|
|
|
|
Web |
|
|
Adr. |
Niels Bohrs Allé 1, 5230 Odense M |
|
|
|
|
Campusvej 55 · 5230 Odense M · Tlf. 6550 1000 · www.sdu.dk |
|
lpell...@gmail.com
Sep 14, 2009, 2:12:28 AM9/14/09
to robwor...@googlegroups.com
Hi
I agree that we should remove the TUL-loader from the core parts of RobWork. I think we have more than enough to do supporting the XML loader and would therefore prefer not to place it in rwlibs which would indicate a continous maintainance of it. I think we should either place it in rwapp or in the deprecated folder we have in rw/src.
Anyone which are opposed to moving and ending maintainance of the TUL format?
- Lars-Peter
I agree that we should remove the TUL-loader from the core parts of RobWork. I think we have more than enough to do supporting the XML loader and would therefore prefer not to place it in rwlibs which would indicate a continous maintainance of it. I think we should either place it in rwapp or in the deprecated folder we have in rw/src.
Anyone which are opposed to moving and ending maintainance of the TUL format?
- Lars-Peter
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages