Let's elect an official Pune Java managing committee for 2009-2010. I am not suggesting that we create any complicated legal entities, but just a team that will be primarily responsible for Pune Java activities.
Designations are important as they give credit for the voluntary work these guys would put in. The designations could be -
- President
- Vice-president
- Secretary
- Student Representative
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Harshad Oak <harshad.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
@Saager - I am fine with creating a committee after a couple of meets and after we have put some faces to names. Thanks for the offer to host a meet in Dec.
You're welcome :)
I believe that unless there is a core team driving the thing, it is unlikely to sustain beyond 4-6 months.
I disagree. I've been to a few bosug, bojug & bfpug meets and they do just fine without managerial structure.I don't quite understand why designations will be a problem. It's not like the the office bearers will be heading BCCI and would have crores at their disposal. We can keep the office bearers term to just 1 year so that a lot of people will get an opportunity to learn & drive a community, while they also give a tiny boost to their resumes.
Just my $0.02 of pop-psy, but I believe that designations shift guilt. Right now, about 200 Java users in the city are guilty about not having organized a meet; once you designate 4 people to be responsible for this, the remaining 196 have less of a reason to feel guilty.
If one wants to contact a company for say space for a meet, free tshirts, free CDs ... or maybe the press, wouldn't it be easier if he is 'President - Pune Java' rather than 'A java developer from Pune'.
Not really, most of this comes through personal contacts. TW Pune ended up hosting the OSDG, Ruby FunDay and several BarCamps out of people having met individual TWers and kept in touch with them.
A very important point to note is that the office bearers will become accountable to the community.
IMHO, it works better when each one of us feels individually accountable to the community.
Having personally helped organize several events at ThoughtWorks (both internal and external), I understand why you feel the need to impose specific accountability, but I've seen those structures fail all too often.
Parting note:
I've seen Conway's Law prove its case so many times that I don't shy away from using it as a guideline.
So if we, as a community, do choose to appoint a committee to manage this group, I'll be seriously disappointed.
--
Saager Mhatre
Hi Harshad,
As you can see, vast majority are opposed to the idea. And if we push something that the vast majority are opposed to, we end up alienating the majority.
As the current group owner, I would not be in favour of that.
I can see where you are coming from with regards to accountability. Yes, there needs to be some accountability.
For approaching companies for freebies, we can simply mention that their brand will be displayed by over a 1000 people. Are they interested in such free publicity? I am sure most businesses will jump at such an opportunity.
What I can say from my experience is that if people get something out of a group, they are more likely to put something back in.
I heard someone was looking to organise meetings. Can we start the process with kicking off the first meeting please?
I would like people to discuss how they want to take the group forward. I am happy to nominate one person in-charge of organising the meetings. And one more person can take on the task of maintaining the online content at www.pune-java.com.
Any volunteers?
Best Regards,
Ashish.
--- In pune-java@yahoogroups.com, Harshad Oak <harshad.lists@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your participation in this discussion.
>
> @Saager - I am fine with creating a committee after a couple of meets and
> after we have put some faces to names. Thanks for the offer to host a meet
> in Dec.
>
> I believe that unless there is a core team driving the thing, it is unlikely
> to sustain beyond 4-6 months.
>
> I don't quite understand why designations will be a problem. It's not like
> the the office bearers will be heading BCCI and would have crores at their
> disposal. We can keep the office bearers term to just 1 year so that a lot
> of people will get an opportunity to learn & drive a community, while they
> also give a tiny boost to their resumes.
>
> If one wants to contact a company for say space for a meet, free tshirts,
> free CDs ... or maybe the press, wouldn't it be easier if he is 'President
> - Pune Java' rather than 'A java developer from Pune'.
>
> I think the people driving the thing will get lot more done if they have
> designations. A very important point to note is that the office bearers will
> become accountable to the community.
>