There's an analogy to be drawn between the transition metals and the macrogen nonmetals which I hadn't previously appreciated.
It transpires that both types of elements are involved in macromolecular chemistry—the transition metals via the formation of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and the macrogens (H, C, N, O, P, S, Se) through the propagation of organic macromolecules or biopolymers.
The analogy occurred to me after I read that the 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry had been awarded for the development of metal-organic frameworks.
The metals involved overwhelmingly belong to the transition series.
So, in comparative taxonomy terms, a d metal ↔ macrogen match-up can be regarded as the generative heart of macromolecular chemistry.
This, in turn, lends further support to the following pairings:
sf metals halogens
p metals metalloids
noble metals noble gases
Here:
- sf metals ↔ halogens express the ionic foundation of life and minerals;
- p metals ↔ metalloids mark the threshold zone of mixed character and niche functions; and
- noble metals ↔ noble gases embody the inert limit—stable, rarefied, and technologically valuable.
René