What's proper? -Time, Energy, Velocity, Force and Acceleration..?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

PC

unread,
Jan 31, 2008, 10:38:54 AM1/31/08
to PSR8-HA
Hi,

Yes, sorry to say it, but I will call the usual definitions for
"improper". -I DO know that this viewpoint is different, so you do NOT
have to flame me on this one. -However I'm not so sensitive about it,
i get more than 100 emails per day (spam 99% ?) at the moment anyway,
but I still really hate flamings!

My definitions:

* Proper TIME: Basically the concept TIME: I use the abbreviation %tau
* Proper ENERGY: I use the concept mass; m*c², as You know from the
PRR8-site (?)
* Proper VELOCITY: I use dr/d/%tau.
* Proper Force: I use: dp over d%tau
* Proper Acceleration: I use: d²r over d%tau²

Peter Christensen

unread,
Feb 8, 2008, 4:16:40 AM2/8/08
to PSR8-HA
I Have changed two things:

Introduced "proper frequency" (f_tau), guess what, based on proper
time instead of the usual "improper" time, which is however what
clocks DO measure...

Introduced M(r) = m(proper)*c^2. I just left the concept "proper
mass", because this is very confusing in practice. "Proper energy",
can simply be defined as:

==========
M(r) = h*f_tau
==========

-Where h is Plancks Constant, and f_tau is as defined above.

Adding a lot more ASAP,

B Rgds,
Peter C

Ps. I think, that I now know to calculate G(h,c), so just have a look
later :-)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages