http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7856678/site/newsweek/
Note the source, so reliability is questionable at best.
This thread was created (from what I understand) to give those who
share the Christian Reformed Church's views on politics in regard to
religion. Those who organize here share the same views about Bush's
visit, and therefore you are in the minority.
Resorting to nitpicking spelling errors is inflammatory at best. The
"isolation" you speak of sure does have a large voice in America today.
If you pay attention to poll results, you can see that Bush holds a
record-low approval rating of 43%. (via a Pew poll:
http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=243) Therefore,
this isolation is yours to experience.
This little microcosm on Google is how the real world functions.
People with similar views come together to get things done. Whether
that means businesses, churches, synagogues, mosques, colleges,
universities or Star Wars fan groups, it all shows how the real world
works.
You may need to chew on this well-stated position of Calvin College on
this visit:
"We are not right wing; we're not left wing. We think our faith trumps
political ideology."-History Professor Randall Jelks
Hopefully you will remember your roots as a Calvin grad, and what the
CRC stands for.
That said, I think Nancy clearly elucidates the problem with Bush
speaking at commencement. She says : " I hope that someday you'll
realize that without business and yes, riches, Calvin College or any
other school for that matter wouldn't exist." The fact is that for us
graduates, all 900 of us, liberal or democrat or some sane balance of
the two, GRADUATION IS NOT A BUSINESS TRANSACTION. I understand
business and the real world but I'm graduating and I don't need my 5
years of hard work to amount to little more than a publicity stunt to
garner funds and global attention. I want to celebrate with my family
and hear from a speaker that actually gives a damn. Shirley Hoogstra
indicated that Bush's speech writers have been in contact with the
college so that they can write a Calvin appropriate speech. HIS SPEECH
WRITERS, not him. Is that not an obvious indication that our big day is
just another stop on the political trail? If my preference for a heart
felt speech from someone who has genuine concern for this community is
indicative of living in a "total fantasy world", then I choose to
forfeit reality.
So...white and black ribbons is it? Any updates on where I can get a
"god is not a..." button? How about a peace symbol button?
Interesting. But the picture isn't a picture of Mark Sytsma. It's a
picture of a current Calvin student whose standards of conduct and
attitude toward his fellow human beeings far exceed what we're seeing
from msytsma here. Oh well.
As I have mentioned many times before, I have written most of my posts
here on the level of the other responses. That was my point. The posts
in this discussion haven't been of a "high standard of conduct."
You are right about one thing, I hate human beings and intentionally go
around looking for ways to degrade them with every chance I get. You
have me pegged.
For starters I'm not a gradute of Calvin College or any other
university; I'm a high school graduate that's worked for a living all
my life, so please forgive my spelling error. But the nasty tone of
your responses and the name-calling you resort to show the emptiness of
your beliefs. You are a fan of the President, but those who are not
are not necessarily wrong. Why should the students of your alma mater
become the backdrop for this politician on one of the most memorable
days of their lives? Just because Karl Rove thinks that Bush will get
a soft reception at a well known "conservative" arts college doesn't
mean that everyone at the campus or in the area has to just shut up and
take it. He and his followers (like yourself) cannot stand any sort of
rebuttal, will never admit they have been wrong, cannot bear to tell
the truth about facts in the world and have no great love of democracy
or human rights despite their overblown rhetoric. What GB wants and
what your ilk would give him is total power. He squeeks by in the last
election and acts like he has been annointed by some supernatural being
with all the power of a king or a tin-horn dictator. But we all know
he's a little spoiled frat boy whose entire life has been a story of
utter luxury and privilege. He is a clown, a puppet for a group of
really ugly people whose sole purpose in life is the pursuit of
"riches" and who will do anything (attack countries illegaly, lie to
his electorate, etc) to get and gain. Why should anyone have to listen
to this scumbag on their graduation day. He is a mass murderer. How's
that for spelling?
Funny you make the comment about biking. I ride my bike as much as
possible, in fact this week I rode it everyday (except for today
because I don't have the proper rain gear) 23 miles to and from work.
Anyway, what lie of Hannity are you referring to? The only thing I saw
was him asking a question to Dr. Jelks. I thought the question was fair
considering what he did and said a few years back. That wasn't a lie,
that was the truth. Jelks was making a fool out of himself with his
statements (which in my exposure to Calvin isn't a new trend for him).
He, and a number of other profs became self-appointed legal experts
even though they have little to no understanding of the role Rhinquist
played in Plessy V Furg. One of the few profs at Calvin with any legal
knowledge was Pollard (Harvard JD, UVA PhD) called these profs and
students on their lack of knowledge and pointed out how they really
didn't know what they were talking about. Yes these guys made a stink
back then and they are still making a stink now. They have a right to
make a stink but they can't complain when people actually hold them
accountable for what they say and do. They for some reason think doing
so is a violation of their free speach or something like that.
Jelks and company haven't been dignified in their "discussion" in the
past--at least by your own standards.