How about from the educator side
Common Core is intended to increase standards for reading and math nationwide. It requires teachers to develop curriculum to sharpen certain skills, expressed in "I can" statements like "I can identify the central idea or theme in a text by identifying key words and their meaning." In math it's worse, nine operations to do long divisions, including the required proof. Common Core was attached to a really difficult test, the PARCC which is intended to measure critical thinking. (In 12 year old kids. Really?)
I have several objections. One is that the PARCC is really complicated and would discourage any child, two is that I am not sure I like the idea of all kids in the US having the same standards, and three, like most federal mandates it is underfunded and there is no established curriculum nor proof that it does anything to help kids get "college and career ready."
Our district kept common core but opted out of the PARCC. You can see the PARCC online. I am not sure the average grad student could pass it, and I am not saying the problem is with the grad students. L
Sent from my iPad