Cheap skate Marine corps chose to let our Marines die from IEDs rather than....

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ProudL...@aol.com

unread,
May 25, 2007, 12:35:52 AM5/25/07
to real-debat...@googlegroups.com, OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
Cheap skate Marine corps chose to let our Marines die from IEDs rather than give them the equipment they needed
by John Aravosis (DC) · 5/24/2007 09:57:00 PM ET
Discuss
this post here: Comment s (84) · digg it · reddit · FARK ·  · Link

Oh yeah, and the Marine Corps lied about it to. So much for "honor." If you're going to let your own guys die because you're too cheap to save their lives, you can at least admit it.

From the Associated Press, here's how they decided NOT to get the IED-proof vehicles that our troops urgently requested:
Brig. Gen. Robert Milstead, chief of Marine Corps public affairs, said cost was not a factor in choosing the Humvee.

"This was not a budgetary decision," Milstead said Wednesday. "You can take that to the bank."

The internal document, however, states that the cost of building new vehicles was a primary reason the request was denied by the Marine Corps Combat Development Command in Quantico, Va.
And we just gave these bozos another $100 billion because they accused us of not caring about the troops. If Bill Clinton had done this, let our troops die because he was too cheap while at the same time posturing about those same IEDs, it'd have been the end of his presidency. We really are pathetic.
 
"If we quit Vietnam, tomorrow we'll be fighting in Hawaii, and next week we'll have to fight in San Francisco." -President Lyndon Johnson




See what's free at AOL.com.

pvfan

unread,
May 25, 2007, 11:53:33 AM5/25/07
to Open Debate Political Forum IMHO
Proud,

Your blaming the wrong people. It was the Marines that brought the
situation to the attention of the media/public. Look at Congress and
civilian govt. red tape if you want a culprit. The Marines, real
Marines not civilian contractors or politicians, always do their best
to take care of and support each other. I know, my service in the
Marines was a looong time ago, but i don't think they have changed
THAT much.

On May 24, 11:35 pm, ProudLiber...@aol.com wrote:
> _Cheap skate Marine corps chose to let our Marines die from IEDs rather than
> give them the equipment they needed_
> (http://www.americablog.com/2007/05/cheap-skate-marine-corps-chose-to-...)
> by _John Aravosis (DC)_
> (http://www.blogger.com/profile/00990747942611347583) · 5/24/2007 09:57:00 PM ET
> Discuss this post here: _Comment s (84)_
> (http://www.haloscan.com/comments.php?user=katsiva&comment=63707072152...) · _digg it_
> (http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.americablog.com/2007/05...
> hose-to-let.html&title=Cheap skate Marine corps chose to let our Marines die
> from IEDs rather than give them the equipment they needed&topic=politics) ·
> _reddit_
> (http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.americablog.com/2007/05/cheap...skate Marine corps chose to
> let our Marines die from IEDs rather than give them the equipment they needed)
> · _FARK_
> (http://cgi.fark.com/cgi/fark/submit.pl?new_url=http://www.americablog...


> skate Marine corps chose to let our Marines die from IEDs rather than give them

> the equipment they needed) ·
> (http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=3798595&postID=63707072152...)
> (http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3798595&postID=637070721526...) · _Link_
> (http://www.americablog.com/2007/05/cheap-skate-marine-corps-chose-to-...)


>
> Oh yeah, and the Marine Corps lied about it to. So much for "honor." If
> you're going to let your own guys die because you're too cheap to save their
> lives, you can at least admit it.
>

> _From the Associated Press_
> (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MARINES_CRITICAL_GEAR?SITE=101...) , here's how they


> decided NOT to get the IED-proof vehicles that our troops urgently requested:
> Brig. Gen. Robert Milstead, chief of Marine Corps public affairs, said cost
> was not a factor in choosing the Humvee.
>
> "This was not a budgetary decision," Milstead said Wednesday. "You can take
> that to the bank."
>
> The internal document, however, states that the cost of building new
> vehicles was a primary reason the request was denied by the Marine Corps Combat
> Development Command in Quantico, Va.
> And we just gave these bozos another $100 billion because they accused us of
> not caring about the troops. If Bill Clinton had done this, let our troops
> die because he was too cheap while at the same time posturing about those same
> IEDs, it'd have been the end of his presidency. We really are pathetic.
>
> "If we quit Vietnam, tomorrow we'll be fighting in Hawaii, and next week
> we'll have to fight in San Francisco." -President Lyndon Johnson
>

> ************************************** See what's free athttp://www.aol.com.

IanH

unread,
May 26, 2007, 11:58:42 AM5/26/07
to Open Debate Political Forum IMHO
The military and the companies that produce military vehicles are
still under contract to make Humvees until the end of this year.
At the end of 2007, Humvee production will stop, and he new vehicle in
production will be the "IED Proof" vehicle you're referring to.

Sad, isn't it? Contracts are what ended up literally being responsible
for the deaths of many soldiers.

pvfan

unread,
May 26, 2007, 5:30:45 PM5/26/07
to Open Debate Political Forum IMHO
Yes, it is. As the saying goes, "bidness is bidness."

If the spelling "marm" Aunt Rant is watching, I spelled business wrong
on purpose.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages