Clarification on SCQSE–E8 and the Gauḍīya Vedānta Conception of Ātmā
Bhakti Niskama Shanta
|
Dear Respected Dr. Bhakti Niskama Shanta Ji,
Om
Shanti.
Please accept our humble greetings with reverence and gratitude.
We sincerely thank you for your profoundly thoughtful, scripturally rooted, and philosophically grounded letter. It is a privilege to engage in dialogue with a scholar so deeply immersed in Gauḍīya Vedānta tattva, whose insights reflect the essence of the Bhāgavata paramparā. Your precision in distinguishing the transcendental ātmā from all material attempts at modeling is duly noted and highly respected.
Our Humble Clarification on Intent. At the outset, we wish to clarify: Our SCQSE–E8 scalar consciousness framework is not an attempt to define or reduce the ātmā or Paramātmā into empirical geometry or field equations. We fully agree that the jīva is acintya, beyond prakṛti, indivisible, and not emergent from any material structure.
Rather, our intention is to inspire spiritual awakening through the language of science—to offer a bridge of inquiry for the modern intellect who has faith in equations but has lost the path to śraddhā (faith) and śabda-pramāṇa (revealed knowledge).
We echo the truth of Bhagavad-gītā 2.20 and 15.15 that you quoted — that true cognition and remembrance flow from the Supersoul. Our scalar models are symbolic representations of material reflections — not of the ātmā itself, but of the interference field where karma unfolds, subtle memory plays out, and mental illusion arises.
On Modeling the Soul as Scalar Point: You are absolutely correct that:
“The ātmā is not material, not geometric, not emergent.” In SCQSE terms, the “10⁻¹⁰⁸ scalar point” is merely a metaphor for the Planck-beyond region — a realm where conventional space-time breaks down and aetheric phenomena may echo certain qualities of the jīva’s effect on prakṛti. We do not equate this scalar point with the jīva-ātmā. Rather, we use this analogy to distinguish the jīva's nonlocal causal footprint on prakṛti, helping physicists understand the ontological asymmetry between consciousness and material causality.
On Śabda vs Science : We fully agree that Vedānta is not to be bent to fit physics. In fact, we often quote:
“śāstra is not validated by science. Rather, science is illuminated by śāstra.” Our research is not an effort to replace śabda with formulas, but to humble the empirical ego by showing that even the most advanced models eventually confront their limits — and from that crisis of knowing, the true quest for divine knowledge begins.
On Paramātmā and Personalism : “Bhagavān is raso vai saḥ — the embodiment of rasa, not a field.”
This is the essence of Gauḍīya Vedānta, and we hold it with deep gratitude. Our use of “scalar coherence” and “informational singularity” in the SCQSE–E8 model is never to describe the Supreme Personality, but to scientifically diagnose the collapse of dharma in the Kaliyuga scalar field — where ignorance of Paramātmā leads to karmic torsion and societal disintegration.
On DNA, Sentience, and Scalar Memory : Again, we do not assert that DNA stores consciousness. Rather, it may act as a resonant biological medium — a gross map upon which subtle sanskāra echoes and karmic tendencies become embodied. This is far from equating biology with soul.
Just as the soul uses the mind–body complex without being of it, we view scalar torsion fields as interfaces, not as origins.
Your insight that: “The real revolution is not a unifying equation, but the reawakening of our spiritual identity with Kṛṣṇa” is the true conclusion of all inquiry — and one that we fully honor.
Yet, for many scientists standing at the threshold of existential doubt, models like SCQSE–E8 may serve as a stepping stone — a way to guide the modern intellect toward surrender, humility, and faith.
If even one atheist physicist begins to ask: “If the unified field is conscious, then who is the Source?” Then perhaps our work has become a humble offering in the Lord's hands.
We deeply value your voice, and we do not seek argument but clarification, purification, and harmony. We are seekers — not siddhas — and your reminder to stay rooted in śāstra and bhakti is the anchor we all need.
We continue our seva in full faith that spiritual science must bow before divine realization, and that true integration of science and Vedānta must preserve the personality, rasa, and līlā of the Supreme Lord.
With folded hands and gratitude,
Dnyandeo Patil
/ Dr. Moninder Singh (Ph.D. Physics)
SCQSE–E8
Scalar Consciousness Lab
COSMOS Research Lab- Mumbai, India
“Vijñānaṁ
yajñam tanute” — May knowledge become a sacred offering.
Dear Member,
We have responded to your post here:
However, we have not yet received a reply from you. Until you address that response, we will not be able to approve further posts on the same topic or its repetitions.Thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
Moderators
