Dear All,
Last spring, I saw something (it was a graphic) about the composition of
attendees at one of the "open-gov" bar-camps in D.C.
(Were there three? TransparencyCamp, Gov20Camp, and ____Camp?)
It was a graphic in the shape of a rectangle, but made up of smaller
rectangles of various sizes, each one representing the percentage of
attendees from various types of organizations. For example: Federal
govt.; Non-profit; Govt. Contractor; State/Local govt.; etc.
I've tried to (re)find it, but came up empty. Does anyone else
remember seeing it and, if so, do you have a clue about where you might
have seen it?
The reason for finding it is that I think it will help us, as a group, to
get a better handle on the various groups of people that would be
interested in attending the OGD-Unconference. If I remember
properly, the graphic showed that "Federal employees" were a
minority of the attendees (maybe around 25 percent).
And if that is true, then I think our planning process should consider
that, among the people who would want to attend the OGD-Unconference, the
primary "practitioners" of the OGD (i.e., federal employees)
might be outnumbered by secondary "supporters" (i.e., all
others) by a ratio of 3 to 1.
For example, this could present a problem if we were to use something
like IdeaScale (used in
Phase 1
of the Open Government Dialogue) for our participants
to suggest
and "vote-up" the biggest questions that they have about
the Open Government Directive (i.e., create a list of "FAQs"
about the OGD).
I would think that federal employees (as the primary
"practitioners" of the OGD) would probably generate questions
different from those generated by "all others". So
we need to make sure that we can differentiate between the needs and
desires of federal employees vs. all other participants.
Can that be done with IdeaScale or another product? I don't know.
(But maybe
you do.)
Basically, I want to make sure that the OGD-Unconference results in
objective information that says "These are the things that
federal employees are saying, doing, and asking about the Open
Government Directive."
I'm interested in your thoughts about this, as well as any other aspect
of planning the OGD-Uncon. (Also, don't forget to tell us if you
know about that bar-camp graphic.)
vr,
Stephen Buckley
co-manager, OGD-Uncon google-group