Bunster147
unread,Dec 14, 2009, 4:57:36 AM12/14/09Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Triamazon
ANDREW HARRIS IS A VICTIM FROM CRIMES COMMITTED BY VARIOUS UK
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
HE HAS SUFFERED THE FOLLOWING ABUSES....
UNFAIR TRIAL FREEDOM OF SPEECH/EXPRESSION RE THE CANCER ACT 1939
TRAFFORD MAGS COURT
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY DWP
DAMAGE & THEFT TO MY PROPERTY BY GM POLICE & MHRA
DEFAMATION OF MY CHARACTER BY MHRA GM POLICE & NATIONAL PRESS
RESTRICTION FORCED UPON MY RIGHT TO TRADE FREELY BY UK GOVERNMENT
DISABILITY RIGHT TO ACCESS ALTERNATIVE HERBS ABUSED/DENIED
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION BY PROSECUTING ME WHEN WHEN I HAVE CANCER AS THE
UK GOVERNMENT RACIALLY DISCRIMINATE ME AS THEY SHOW NO COMPASSION TO
ME BUT SHOW AND GIVE COMPASSION TO A LYBIAN MUSLIM MURDERER AS HE GETS
RELEASED JUST BECAUSE HE HAS CANCER
(LOCKERBIE BOMBER)
WHERE IS THE SAME COMPASION FOR ME ?
I AM THERFOR TREATED DIFFERENTLY,
DISABLILITY / RACIAL DISCRIMATION BY UK GOVERNMENT.
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE ASYLUM SEEKERS GET THEIR TV LICENCE
PAID, FREE TELEPHONE BILLS, FREE GAS AND ELECTRICTY, TV FURNITURE
WHITE GOODS ETC.
I DO NOT GET THESE EVERY DAY NECESSATIES THAT MUSLIMS IN BURY GET
UNDER A HOME OFFICE LANDLORD TENNANCY AGREEMENT
I AM DENIED MY HUMAN RIGHTS AND I AM DENIED LAWFUL JUSTICE BY THE UK
GOVERNMENT
I AM A VICTIM OS ASPARTAME, VIOX AND SEROXAT BUT I AM DENIED LEGAL AID
TO SUE IN A PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM.
(NaturalNews) Previously secret documents that surfaced at a Vioxx
court case in April of this year reveal pharmaceutical giant Merck
maintained a "hit list" of doctors to be "neutralized" for speaking
out against Vioxx. Although this story was reported on NaturalNews and
other sites in April, Merck's involvement in the recent round of swine
flu vaccines raises new questions regarding Merck's behavior towards
its critics (see below).
As was reported in The Australian, documents that have surfaced in the
Federal Court in Melbourne expose the criminal intent of Merck
staffers who admitted they intended to "stop funding to institutions"
and "interfere with academic appointments." (These actions are highly
illegal, by the way.)
According to on-the-record testimony in this Australian trial, one
Merck employee said, in referring to the doctors on the hit list, "We
may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live..."
That sounds a lot like a mob boss ordering a hit on a competing street
thug, doesn't it?
At least eight clinical investigators were threatened or intimidated
by Merck, the court heard in testimony. This is congruent with the
many reports of academic intimidation by Merck that have already been
published on NaturalNews.com and other news outlets. The picture of
Merck that emerges from these revelations is a company run by thugs
who deal with dissent by seeking to destroy the lives and careers of
academics who dare to tell the truth about Merck's dangerous drugs.