Thank you very much for the mail.
I agree, Dr. Yunus is a dynamic and prolific speaker. He has mastered the
skills and experience to do and defend what he believes to be right.
He may partially be right to compare the poor with bonsai, because
sincere and genuine initiatives are really required to develop human
potentials and reduce poverty. Many countries in the world have proved
so. But, I don't agree that poverty can be completely alleviated, or each
human being can be developed to an acceptable standard. Who will set that
standard and how relevant is any standard, given that people's perception
about any standard frequently changes. For example, U.N says that people
living on or less than $1 per day are below the poverty line (please
correct me if I am wrong). Should we belive then, for argument, that the
world is free from poverty because one day there is nobody in the world
who lives on less than $1 a day? If that day ever comes, I promise,
people will set another standard to define poor, say living on less than
$5 per day or more and more. So, sending poverty to the museum is an
elusive idea only?
Again even with the best efforts, initiatives and opportunities poverty
cannot be completely alleviated. For example, there are 10 million people
in the U.S who cannot read or write (courtesy National Geographic
Channel), slums exists in downtown Paris, you can find beggars in the
streets of London. Some may argue that "those are bloody illegal
immigrants, we are really not so". Hope you are right.
Dr. Yunus is trying to alleviate poverty through capitalism - allow
people to build capital and become rich (if I am right). I was wandering
whether that was the most perfect way of social and human development.
Reality probably will say otherwise. Capitalism is often blamed for
making rich richer and poor poorer. Again some may argue that "look
at the developed world, all of them are capitalists." I agree, they
are developed countries. They are owners of the richest economies of the
world. But at the same time you have to look into the impact of their
economic developments on others i.e. African mines, Middle Eastern oil,
Latin American resources, Asian poor (working on hazardous industries all
exported by them). You have also to look into their development impact on
the environment, wildlife, sea, ozone and aerospace. Taken all together,
they are really contributing directly or indirectly in the creation or
alleviation of poor (not poverty) and destruction of the world itself.
For this argument, please don't think that I am a believer of socialism
and absolute equality. Russia tried this and failed. China has now
changed its philosophy and adopted all attributes of capitalism. If
China, India and Brazil become capitalist like the U.S and achieve that
kind of development, I am afraid our world could not survive the torment
of such development and collapse. I am sorry, probably I have diverted my
discussion.
So what I was trying to maintain that poverty cannot be completely
eradicated. Because, development itself is responsible for creating
poverty somewhere else. And in this globalized world, you are affected by
others' circumstances. If someone from the western Europe or North
America or East Asia think that we are developed and we will remain so
for ever, they may be proved wrong in the long run. Because, poor of the
other part of the world will throng onto you and claim their share of
development.
But I agree with the idea that poverty can be reduced in our country with
the improvement in education, law and order situation, human skill
development as well as through creation of economic opportunities for the
poor. But it is certainly not only through micro-finance. I will not be
surprised if someday, the richest micro-finance institutions are
nationalized (now they have really become conglomerates and competing
with the private sector). They are non-profit making organisations, hence
don't need to pay taxes. Others, for example pays corporate taxes up to
45% of their income. Philosophically they are apolitical. Now they are
supporting politics and creating political party themselves using the
resources they build at the cost of macro economy. So there is anomaly. I
don't know how long this will be tolerated. I also don't know whether
there will really be days when NGOs and MFIs give us a perfect form of
government/society where there will be no poor, just rich.
No more for the moment. Please send your views.
Regards.
Formanul
S. M. Formanul Islam
Assistant Director (Legal) and
Company Secretary
Infrastructure Development Company Limited
Tel: +88-02-8117526
Fax:+88-02-8116663