Dear Mr Boxstrom
One of our members has raised with me the
misrepresentation which has occoured regarding the reported sale of the Lotus
Eleven previously belonging to David Springett.
This car clearly has no known chassis
number.
This was acknowledged by Mr Springett in
e-mail correspondence prior to you advertising the car.
The claim that it is Chassis Number 189 not
only is false , but it offends the owner of the true 189 Eleven which has
continuous history and the original Lotus Chassis Plate.
What was written about the car are
my words as Eleven Registrar , but to these have been added
that "many Elevens have dual claim to a chassis number".
This is clearly unture .With all of the
240 plus cars Registered with the Historic Lotus Register , no two original
Elevens claim the same chassis number. The only exception are a couple
of Replicas making blatantly false
claims.
I was friendly with Dave Springett when he used
"189" as a convenient number for a UK road document over 30 years ago, but he
was of course well aware that this was another cars` number.
In the light of some recent court cases where
Elevens have been misrepresented upon their sale where the court costs
in one instance exceeding the value of the car, I would seriously advise
you as follows:
You should publically withdraw you claim that
the Eleven is anything to do with chassis 189 [and the grossly
misleading history linking it to the famous first owner of the real
Eleven189] and also inform the purchaser to cover yourself from
litigation.
Perhaps you would be kind enough to just
acknowledge receipt of this message.
Yours Sincerely
Victor Thomas
Lotus Eleven Registrar
Copy to: Google Lotus History Group