pypt-offline-0.6.1 released

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

Hi,

I've just released pypt-offline-0.6.1.
This is a minor bugfix release.

For details:
http://pypt-offline.sf.net

Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research."
"The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are those who
cannot - rrs"

[Ujwal]

hi i understand ur point but here were nobody suggestin or reporting
haven't u gone mad
plz don't mind about the site
http://classifiednepal.com.np

[nepBabu.cx]

Hey Ujwal bro the bugfix is perhaps done by Ritesh to improve his
software himself. If the software has some features that has to be
improved (for e.g., he added multi-threading support for pypt-offline),
sometimes developers put it as Bug fix rather than feature improvement.
But his initial release was just a beta so he's obviously used
incremental methodology to release his software which is a good thing
I've found.

But obviously it seems he's not mad. Since no one seems to be helping
Ritesh, he's taken the responsibility himself to improve his Python
software and relase shorter fixes.

Goodluck to him and his software. ;-)

thanks.

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

My first impression looking at Ujjwal's message was that it might be spam
(given the link advertisement).
:-)

Ujjwal,
I wrote this program for 2 reasons.
a) I felt the urge. When working in Dell's restrictive environment, I needed a
way to update my laptop at home running Debian. That was when I thought of
pypt-offline.
b) I wasn't born a programmer. I enjoyed a lot learning and writing this
program (I hope I'll enjoy much more with more projects alike).

And on top of all that, the community is what I came to learn whatever I've
learned today ( I wasn't sent to college to do CS). And sharing is the key
mantra of the community.

If something doesn't interest you, you can simply ignore it.

As for the rest, what nepBabu has mentioned is absolutely correct.

[nepBabu.cx]

Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> My first impression looking at Ujjwal's message was that it might be spam
> (given the link advertisement).
> :-)
>

I think it's not spammer/troller because he seems to be listed at the
SFD meeting.. Ujwal Shrestha or something.. _Unless_ his system is
hijacked.

thanks.

[Ujwal]

hi Ritesh Raj Sarraf
don't mind over those words and they were also not the spams for u and
other i only mean is u r doing everything for ur project. i've
downloaded that too but there were not a good community to help u. u r
doing urself only and for most of the case people feels frusted when
they got no responce. But ur not like that. Sorry for those words if it
harms u any.
Ujwal

> --nextPart4885993.ZQAY6fJKUQ
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> X-Google-AttachSize: 190