LexiconInterchangeFormat

I'm writing an application which accesses lexicons, and the first task is to turn the various

In the long-standing tradition of making dictionaries in the Mexico Branch and other places in the

LS I am looking for a DTD based on LIFT (0.13) that I can use to import xml (lexiquepro) into

Hi John (and other LIFTers), Thanks so much for your response! I took a look at FLEx and it looks

The RNG for LIFT version 0.13 does not include "extensible" in range-element, and neither

> Do I think correctly that the lift.rng for each LIFT is tailored by hand > according to the

Thanks everyone for continuing to work on the two pending RFCs. I've been happy to see the

Alas, that would be me. I am using LIFT 0.13 to generate the content at: http://web.unbc.ca/~smalgyax

> Certainly, if you give us write access to the document so that we can insert > comments or

Dear LIFTers, Following this message, I will be sending out two Requests For Comment on proposed

Dear Martin, Thanks for your quick and clear answers. I'm going to insert some of my own

Hi, In the lift standard and rng I see this: <sch:rule context="field" > <sch:

Doug, I would be personally interested in knowing more about what you are talking about (perhaps off-

Dear Helen, > BTW, I don't think we will be putting GOLD mappings in the header, > after

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:50:14 +0000 lexiconinterchan...@googlegroups.com wrote: > This

Dear All, I've just checked in an update lift.odt heading towards 0.15. @guid has been removed

Dear Steve, > Could range-element inherit from extensible? Everything is permissible but not

Dear Steve, > Here's my proposed redefinition of field and field-defn: > field >

> If we do agree on guid based ids, and on using the normal guid hexadecimal-with-hyphens

See: http://adambosworth.net/2009/10/29/talking-to-dc/ Lots to think on… don't miss the

Let's get some discussion on what exactly our boundaries are and would be involved to pull this

Hi, Well, we do need agreement on so many things when it comes to interoperability between our

We'll try to address this issue, but it's not going to happen for FLEx 6.0, which is in the

Hi Dave, >"An Entry is made up of a number of senses. Each sense corresponds to a part of

Hi, I have searched this group with the term 'XDXF' and received no hits. Can someone please

Dear Ron, > I was wondering if I was misunderstanding your nomenclature. :) Just wanted to reply

In the latest version of Lexique Pro (3.2), released yesterday: For pictures: LP looks at relative

Dear Jeremy, Sorry for being slow on moderating your message in. I think things should be fine now.

Dear All, In ensuring consistency across the standard, I have transferred the UML diagrams to argouml

Sigh... I'm embarrassed that I didn't consider this problem. Microsoft pushes, for example,