One happy LPG user here. Happy because every time i fill up, now at
Php 30.50 per liter, it really puts a smile on my face knowing it's
good for the environment.
Had mine installed on an 01 Vitara (box type) at StarGas. Quite
pricey but i did not want to take the risk on DIY or Korean systems
because of the general complaints from taxi drivers. Four skeptical
friends have also taken the plunge because of my install.
Use it everyday now and have brought it to Baguio twice without any
hitches whatsoever.
Cheers!
rico
P.S.
Hi rem
Here are some questions i would like to ask here in this group:
1) Why do you think the petroleum companies are pushing for Ethanol? E10, E85...
2) Don't you think LPG prices will go up once more people get to use it?
Cheers!
I'm still waiting to take the plunge. One reason is the availability
here in Negros. Any comment on performance on rough roads? I'm afraid
parts will come lose, need repairs, and even pose danger.
TIA, Cidni
>
1) There are supposedly over 100 stations that sell LPG in and around
Metro-Manila. This is definitely was my decision whether to convert
or not. I started with Petron then moved to SEA OIL without any
perceived difference. Now i use CLEAN FUEL because it is the cheapest
I could find at Php 30.50 / liter.
2) It also largely depends on who will do the installation. A
properly installed unit should be as simple as a gasoline fed vehicle.
Once installed you will be driving a hybrid and every perception or
accepted practice that comes with it. We're just used to gasoline as a
fuel.
Hope this helps!
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Eric Punzalan <punz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm....the expensive type hehehe...more efficient though......
I LOSE AN ESTIMATED 10-12% EFFICIENCY ON AN SGI SYSTEM BECAUSE OF THE
LOWER BTU BUT GAIN BIGTIME ON THE ANTI KNOCK PROPERTIES. WHAT ABOUT ON
CARBURATED SYSTEMS?
>
> Debate on biofuels, which include ethanol, are still "hot" .
>
> Some resons for the shift include:
>
> a) renewability (oil supply is finite)
> b) Greenhouse gas reduction , cleaner emissions (although newer engine
> technology can produce cleaner engines)
ISN'T LPG GREENER WITH WATER VAPOR AND CARBON DIOXIDE AS BI-PRODUCTS?
> c) benefit to agriculture/farmers in terms of more demand for ethanol
> production feedstock.
> d) reduced foreign fuel dependence for countries that import oil but can
> produce ethanol.
WE DON'T HAVE AS MUCH IDLE LAND AS BRAZIL OR OTHER SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES.
>
> The food to fuel issue, however, needs to be resolved but there's promise
> coming from
> the cellulose (non-food) to ethanol technology.
DON'T WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE FARMERS TO PRODUCE/PLANT OUR STAPLE FOOD
RATHER THAN IMPORT RICE? KULANG SILA SA INCENTIVE TO PLANT.
FOOD TO FUEL SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE.
>
> There's also fear that more forests may be lost to biofuel feedstock
> production.
>
> Global trends show governments creating favorable policies for ethanol use
> (tax breaks, subsidies, etc.)
>
> LPG? It's non-renewable, like oil....if the supply goes down, prices will go
> up too :)
ISN'T IT A BI-PRODUCT WHEN PETROL IS PRODUCED? IT'S ALSO AVAILABLE IN
NATURAL GAS? WHAT HAPPENED TO MALAMPAYA ET AL?
> I think because it's socially-sensitive, the price may remain "affordable"
> (?)
HOUSEWIVES TAKING TO THE STREETS ARE LESS TOLERABLE THAN STUDENTS UP IN ARMS?
I'VE STOPPED CONVINCING THE DOUBTING THOMASES BECAUSE I BELIEVE IF
GOVERNMENT TAKES NOTICE THEY MAY INCREASE AUTOGAS PRICES.
AGAIN THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS. THANKS!
DR. ERIC,
MY RESPONSE IN CAPS... JUST THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS ONLY.
I LOSE AN ESTIMATED 10-12% EFFICIENCY ON AN SGI SYSTEM BECAUSE OF THE
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Eric Punzalan <punz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm....the expensive type hehehe...more efficient though......
LOWER BTU BUT GAIN BIGTIME ON THE ANTI KNOCK PROPERTIES. WHAT ABOUT ON
CARBURATED SYSTEMS?
>ISN'T LPG GREENER WITH WATER VAPOR AND CARBON DIOXIDE AS BI-PRODUCTS?
> Debate on biofuels, which include ethanol, are still "hot" .
>
> Some resons for the shift include:
>
> a) renewability (oil supply is finite)
> b) Greenhouse gas reduction , cleaner emissions (although newer engine
> technology can produce cleaner engines)
WE DON'T HAVE AS MUCH IDLE LAND AS BRAZIL OR OTHER SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES.
> c) benefit to agriculture/farmers in terms of more demand for ethanol
> production feedstock.
> d) reduced foreign fuel dependence for countries that import oil but can
> produce ethanol.
>DON'T WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE FARMERS TO PRODUCE/PLANT OUR STAPLE FOOD
> The food to fuel issue, however, needs to be resolved but there's promise
> coming from
> the cellulose (non-food) to ethanol technology.
RATHER THAN IMPORT RICE? KULANG SILA SA INCENTIVE TO PLANT.
FOOD TO FUEL SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE.
>
> There's also fear that more forests may be lost to biofuel feedstock
> production.
>
> Global trends show governments creating favorable policies for ethanol use
> (tax breaks, subsidies, etc.)
>
> LPG? It's non-renewable, like oil....if the supply goes down, prices will go
> up too :)
ISN'T IT A BI-PRODUCT WHEN PETROL IS PRODUCED?
IT'S ALSO AVAILABLE IN
NATURAL GAS? WHAT HAPPENED TO MALAMPAYA ET AL?
HOUSEWIVES TAKING TO THE STREETS ARE LESS TOLERABLE THAN STUDENTS UP IN ARMS? I'VE STOPPED CONVINCING THE DOUBTING THOMASES BECAUSE I BELIEVE IF GOVERNMENT TAKES NOTICE THEY MAY INCREASE AUTOGAS PRICES. AGAIN THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS. THANKS!
> I think because it's socially-sensitive, the price may remain "affordable"
> (?)
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Greg Buenas <gbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>> Yes sir SGI type.
>>
>> Here are some questions i would like to ask here in this group:
>>
>> 1) Why do you think the petroleum companies are pushing for Ethanol? E10,
>> E85...
>>
>> 2) Don't you think LPG prices will go up once more people get to use it?
>>
>> Cheers!
Hittin the bottle may make good sense after all! I like your sense of humor doc.
Cheers! Let's all have a drink but not of the denatured type. hehehe

A turbo charged LPG powered car .... must be exciting!
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Greg Buenas <gbu...@gmail.com> wrote:i guess i am in the right forum then. So do i gather we're multi-tasking, pro conservation, hybrid technology, green peace loving, penny pinching and once in awhile speed freak advocates? hehe
Cheers then!
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Ed Garcia <eppg...@gmail.com> wrote:Nothing bad about a turbo. IMHO, it is actually a "pro-conservation" innovation in that it maximizes engine power output at better efficiency. Big trucks and even ocean vessels come with a turbo in order to maximize power and conserve fuel. If it were not for the turbocharger, the diesel engine would not shine in comparison to gasoline engines in terms of power and efficiency.
Yun nga lang ... for some people, when more power is available, they squeeze the power out for thrills ... eh di hindi ka na nakatipid kung ganoon! heheheOn Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Greg Buenas <gbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Turbo? O-oh! Am i on the right forum? ;) My Jazz is, well, turbo charged. :guilty: :blush:
--
----- Original Message -----From: Greg BuenasSent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:17 AMSubject: Re: Happy LPG user
----- Original Message -----From: Greg BuenasSent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:48 PMSubject: Re: Happy LPG user
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Greg Buenas <gbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
For those who have made the shift to dual fuel autogas:
Did you change spark plug heat range?
Tnx!