Hi,
I am not an expert in this, but according to the paper published by RDH (
rdh.com) on the
International Window Standards (2014), where they compared the NFRC 100 & 200, PHI, ISO 10077-2 and 15099 standards, there are variations in results when using these different procedures to simulate window performance.
In that report, they state: "The frame cavity conductivity is higher for NFRC/CSA than for ISO (NFRC k = 0.5804 W/m-K compared to k = 0.4298 W/m-K for
ISO). The main material difference noted was that of fiberglass, which has a conductivity of 0.30 W/m-K for NFRC/CSA procedures,
compared to 0.40 W/m‐K for ISO procedures."
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Vlad