Imagine that a perfect text of law is being proposed to the
parliament, meaning that to be perfect is almost impossible because
grammar form of our language badly describes actions embedded in text
- some of them simply do not have answers where, why, who, etc. must
do this action. Parliament discussions and additions make that text of
law less feasible, if it was so. But if to imagine that democracy
brings the perfect description of the actions needed in the text of
law, do you think that executive power timely corrects work
instructions for the state servants, meaning that parliament produces
these texts daily?
These gaps in content are the source of corruption. Linguistics does
not see these gaps and went to psycho area - memes, emotion
intelligence, complexity in general ... to a deadlock.
And how the people can control the preparation of law content if even
elite has no clue how to do that?
That is why I think that mature democracy means mature corruption.
Nikolay