Landmark Ecclesiology
By R. L. Vaughn
Landmarkism is a "logical system" of ecclesiology. ... I will
give below what I believe to be the main points or basic substance of
this ecclesiological system.
About six or seven years ago, I conducted a study to identify/count
independent unaffiliated Baptist churches holding Landmark ecclesiology.
To do so I had to develop criteria to identify such churches -- what
might be the essence of being "Landmark". The three
pillars of Landmarkism (A. C. Dayton, J. R. Graves and J. M.
Pendleton) were not agreed in all points. For example, Graves held that
New Testament use of the word "church / ekklesia" always meant
a local congregation. Pendleton thought that in some cases it meant
"the church in the aggregate." I determined the best way to
identify a "Landmarker" or church holding Landmark ecclesiology
would be to identify the common characteristics of
"self-identified" Landmark Baptists from their day to the
present. From that I developed what I believed would be the minimum
requirements (in combination) it would take to be a "Landmark
Baptist church" or "Landmark Baptist". All might not agree
with my method or my conclusion, but I offer the results here for
comment.
Landmarkism:
1. The church is a local autonomous body authorized by Jesus Christ to
evangelize, baptise, and teach His disciples.
2. Jesus organized His church during His personal ministry, promised its
continued existence, and that church (generically) still exists
today.
3. Baptism is the immersion of a believer in water by the authority of a
local New Testament church; believers who have been immersed by other
denominations must submit to baptism by an authorized
administrator.
4. The Lord's supper is restricted to baptised believers who are walking
in orderly church capacity.
This ecclesiology is most often associated with Missionary Baptists,
since the name and the systemization of it were associated with Dayton,
Graves, Pendleton and others in the Southern Baptist Convention in the
mid 1800s. Some who hold the above ecclesiology prefer not to be called
Landmarkers. Among some Missionary Baptists it has never attained common
usage, though they gladly own all four points listed above. It is
debatable whether it is proper to use this term in reference to others.
Nevertheless, other Baptists hold a similar ecclesiology.