Hi Sacha,
Basically the Euclidean distance already sums up the values of the
bins: sqrt((binA1-binB1)²+...+bin(An-binBn)²), so the Manhattan
distance is not necessary at this point. Generally, there exist
specialized distance measures for histograms as you said:
1) Mahalanobis distance (sometimes named Quadratic-Form DF as you
said)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahalanobis_distance
2) Histogram Intersection Distance
de.lmu.ifi.dbs.elki.distance.distancefunction.HistogramIntersectionDistanceFunction
3) Earth Movers Distance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_mover%27s_distance
I would give all of them a try. From what I have read, Mahalanobis
was sometimes referred to as being better than Euclidean, however
it is much more expensive to calculate. From an efficiency point
of view, HID should be faster than Mahalanobis (however, probably
at the cost of quality).
I am unfortunately not too much into Tamura Featues. Probably
Franz Graf knows more about this. However often it makes sense to
normalize the feature dimensions. If one dimension is in a range
[0,100000] and all other dimensions are in range [0,1], than a
single dimension will most likely dominate all other dimensions if
you use Euclidean distance.
Cheers
Johannes