> On Jul 2, 2017, at 19:52 PM, Vince Koloski <
vkst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I came across this link in an article on the
unz.com website.
> It is the response by a black student group to an email sent by the Claremont Colleges chiding them for wanting to ban the appearance of one Heather MacDonald
> at one of the College's Athenaeum. I am wondering if any one can tell me exactly what their argument is for banning the appearance. It is not something that comes clear
> at first glance.
It’s been a while since I read anything by Heather MacDonald. At the time I could find nothing objectionable in it which doesn’t, of course, rule out that she’s adopted some unsavory views since then. But I never got a whiff of the kind of stuff they’re whining about.
Of course, the more objectionable her views are the more they need protection from this kind of bullying. And I’m ready to call a Poe on a phrase like “Anti-blackness”.
Best I can tell their argument is “Heather MacDonald is guilty of think crime."
--
--Craig WWSJD?
clg...@me.com http://www.craig-good.com
If you can read this, thank a teacher.
Since it's in English, thank a soldier.