Fw: [itfc] The View From Churchmans

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Eric Piazzoni

unread,
Jan 2, 2012, 5:37:48 PM1/2/12
to ITFC-NASC Group

~PZ

*Sent from my phone...please ignore typos*

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rand <chris...@gmail.com>
Sender: itfc-b...@debaser.org
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 22:35:38
To: Ipswich Mailing List<it...@debaser.org>
Subject: [itfc] The View From Churchmans

Ipswich Town 1 Nottingham Forest 3

I’m not sure when – or if – Town have previously lost five out of six
home matches, but I can’t even find the motivation to look it up at
the moment. Perhaps the most damning statistic, however, is that in
their last 10 matches, Forest have failed to score an astonishing 8
times …but in the other 2 games, they’ve scored 3 goals – both times
against Ipswich’s woeful defence. Never has a side’s supporters been
able to sing “can we play you every week?” with such sincerity.

A classic was hardly on the cards, with both clubs having lost 8 of
their previous 11 league matches. The Championship doesn’t offer much
worse form than this at the moment, and there wasn’t much in the way
of confidence or creativity on either side. The Town supporters’ fears
about a central defence without Sonko or Collins were well founded,
with the division’s most inept strike force able to force critical
mistakes out of them almost at will. At the other end, only the
enthusiasm of an unexpectedly recalled Andy Drury prevented things
from being similarly painful to watch. Almost despite having no real
game plan, Town actually created a handful of chances, but the
finishing from Emmanuel-Thomas and Murphy was abysmal.

This is one of the most dispiriting periods I can remember in 35 years
of watching Town regularly, but like everyone else, I don’t have the
answers. This is the third manager in a row who really ought to be
competent enough at this level; the support has remained relatively
loyal; and there’s money been made available, for the last three years
at least. Yet all we have is a club which instead of creating a real
character from nothing, is now more likely to take in players (like
Bullard, Bowyer and Chopra) who might still have been good enough and
suck the life out of them. There’s no point in messing around with
Marcus Evans’ money in this transfer window: either we get in an
inspiring, larger-than-life centre-back and captain to build the team
around, or we just have the end-of-season party now.

Overall Town performance:
3/10 – No shape, no game plan, no structure, no confidence, no
leadership and no hope of any improvement on the horizon, from what I
can see.

Opposition quality:
3/10 – Yet another desperately ordinary outfit made to look almost
competent by Town’s ineptitude.

Referee:
6/10 – Decent enough.

Match excitement:
5/10 – Well, there were four goals and a hatful of missed
opportunities from both sides, so quality of football aside, not that
bad really.

Opposition supporters:
7/10 – Reasonable turnout, and had a lot of fun at Town’s expense,
raising more than a few smiles along the way.

Player ratings, as ever 1 to 5 for each of effort/achievement…

LEE-BARRETT 6 (3/3) probably can’t be blamed for the goals, and wasn’t
tested much, but I doubt he’ll ever be the inspirational figure it
would be so nice to have at the back.

EDWARDS 4 (2/2) was just Carlos being his usual self – he does a job,
but it’s really not good enough on the back foot or front; DELANEY 5
(3/2) was one of only two or three players who you felt wanted to be
there, and we shouldn’t underestimate that at the moment, but he
played his part in a poor defensive display; INGIMARSSON 3 (2/1) was
simply awful, and surely cannot ever again be picked ahead of Smith,
Ainsley or my Mum; and even CRESSWELL 5 (2/3) seemed listless,
although he made a reasonable contribution regardless.

MARTIN 4 (2/2) was all but invisible for the whole time he was on;
BOWYER occasionally got stuck in, but you just keep wondering what
he’s supposed to be doing; LEADBITTER 4 (2/2) again covered enough of
the pitch, without making anything happen; and MURPHY 4 (2/2) didn’t
pose any real threat, missing the two chances he was given.

DRURY 6 (4/2) was the pick of the team, simply because he looked like
he’d been given a chance and wanted to impress, although sadly he
couldn’t create anything of real consequence; and although I was
delighted to see EMMANUEL-THOMAS 4 (2/2) get the opportunity to lead
the line, he once again looked more clumsy than skilful, and was never
remotely the threat we’re all desperately hoping he might become.

Substitutes: CHOPRA 3 (2/1) hovered around the periphery, but rarely
have I seen a player so uninvolved in 50 minutes of play; CARSON had
more of the ball, but the flair (and confidence) seems to have gone;
and ELLINGTON just looked like a forgettable reserve striker.

--
regards
Chris Rand
Cherry Hinton Blue
============================================================
Yes - we really have found the cheapest stuff on Amazon!
http://www.discountsorcerer.co.uk/
============================================================

_______________________________________________
itfc mailing list
it...@debaser.org
http://www.debaser.org/itfc
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages