[EASST-Eurograd] CfP "When models act: Forecasting, automation and the politics of future-making" EASST 2026
Paulos Julio via Eurograd
Dear colleagues,
we are happy to invite contributions to our panel “When models act: Forecasting, automation and the politics of future-making” at EASST 2026 (Kraków, 8–11 September 2026).
Please propose, if interested, abstracts of max. 250 words until February 28th, 23:59 CET through the conference website.
You can find below the description of the session.
When models act: Forecasting, automation and the politics of future-making
Models have long been central to the ways societies imagine, plan and govern their futures. From epidemiological curves and mobility simulations to climate scenarios and economic forecasts, they have served as technologies of future-making, representing complex dynamics in order to anticipate and prepare for what may come. Through dashboards, indicators and simulations, abstract futures are rendered actionable in the present, turning anticipation into administration.
Today, however, we are witnessing a profound reconfiguration of what models are and what they do. Digital twins, large language models (LLMs), real-time dashboards and generative simulations no longer merely represent reality from a distance but increasingly intervene within it. A digital twin of a city no longer simply forecasts flood risks but automatically adjusts water infrastructure; a mobility dashboard not only visualizes congestion but redirects flows as they emerge; an LLM no longer summarizes expertise but drafts policy texts that circulate and persuade. Models, once instruments of knowledge, are becoming sociotechnical actors in their own right, devices that both describe and perform the worlds they claim to represent (Latour 1987; Suchman 2007).
This shift from predictive and prescriptive, to automated and generative marks a new stage in the politics of modeling. Forecasts that once invited reflection now execute interventions. Promises of efficiency and resilience coexist with risks of bias, opacity, and the erosion of judgment. Dashboards promise transparency even as they delimit what counts as knowledge, concealing the infrastructures of data, computation, and labor that sustain their authority (MacKenzie 2021).
We situate these developments within a wider landscape of technologies of future-making, including scenario planning, foresight and road mapping, which do more than represent. They configure imaginaries, orient decisions and redistribute authority. Futures, in this view, are not merely described but actively constituted.
Julio Paulos (ETH Zürich)
Ignacio Perez (University of Oxford)
Associate Director, Research
Future Cities Lab (FCL) Global
ETH Zürich DARCH
julio....@arch.ethz.ch
Confidentiality Note: This message, its contents and the attachments thereto may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if you received this message in error, do not disclose, use, print, store, copy or act in reliance on it or its attachments. Instead, please inform the sender and then delete all copies from your computer system. Thank you.