[PHILOS-L] Contesting AI Network Online Talk - 21st Jan
Gary Brian Smith
CAUTION: This email originated outside of the University. Do not click links unless you can verify the source of this email and know the content is safe. Check sender address, hover over URLs, and don't open suspicious email attachments. |
Dear All,
The Contentious Politics Of AI Network (https://contestingai.uk) organises monthly talks. The next one is coming up:
The AI Matrix: Profits, Politics, and the Struggle Over Our Tech Future
Speakers: Regine Paul and Vali Stan
This talk will introduce the new book by Regine Paul, Daniel Mügge, and Vali S., The AI Matrix: Profits, Power, Politics - available open access (https://lnkd.in/eEaxYAd7).
21 January 2026, 3pm (GMT)
Register here: https://lnkd.in/eWYrjJpW
AI is often presented in extremes, either as a revolutionary technology boosting prosperity for everyone, or as a juggernaut that threatens jobs, democracy, or even human life. This talk cuts through those narratives by asking a simpler question: who really benefits from AI, and who has the power to shape how it is made and used? Drawing on a critical political economy perspective, we argue that today’s AI boom is not simply about clever machines taking over, but about profit imperatives and political choices. AI technologies are developed and deployed within pre-existing economic structures, largely reinforcing inequalities between industries, workers, and countries rather than transforming them away.
Acknowledgement of this distinct socio-economic embedding of a hyped technology informs our search for forms of resistance. Contrary to the techno-determinist idea that the spread of AI is inevitable, and based on our recent co-authored book “The AI Matrix”, we present growing efforts to push back against the harmful and extractive uses of such technologies. These include workers challenging algorithmic surveillance and automation efforts, activists exposing the socio-ecological costs hidden in AI value chains, whistleblowers publicising biased systems and opaque business decisions, but also technicians experimenting with alternative, more public-interest-driven and less extractive forms of AI. Together, these emerging critical engagements with mainstream big tech show that AI futures remain contested and ultimately open. Whether current tech developments deepen global inequalities or support fairer and more democratic societies therefore depends less on the technology itself than on the collective decisions we make about the role of AI in our economies and societies.
Warmest Wishes,
Gary Smith
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Zhejiang University School of Philosophy
Co-Organiser
Contentious Politics of AI Network
Philos-L "The Liverpool List" is run by the Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l/ Messages to the list are archived at http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Recent posts can also be read in a Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosL/ Follow the list on Twitter @PhilosL. Follow the Department of Philosophy @LiverpoolPhilos To sign off the list send a blank message to philos-l-unsub...@liverpool.ac.uk.