hi all ,
This is a reflection i shared in the learning to read course i took last summer. It is about the READING WAR between two instructional approaches.
There have been two general instructional approaches that governed reading education. They are generally known as Phonics and Whole Language approaches. These approaches to reading instruction reflect very different fundamental philosophies and stress very different skills. The philosophy of the Whole Language approach is that reading is a natural process, much like learning to speak. Children need to be exposed to a great deal of authentic texts. They will naturally become literate, without much in the way of explicit systematic phonics instructions. The philosophy of the Phonics approach is that in order to learn to read, most students require a great deal of explicit instruction in the rules of printed text.
attached is a document that summarises both similarities and differences.
hala
From: ode...@hotmail.com
To: I2...@googlegroups.com
Subject: reading wars
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:14:01 +0000
Hi Pan,
I agree it is challenging to implement a balanced and integrated approach between the holistic and phonitec approach to teaching reading, because we tend to yield towards an approach. As it proved the failure of standing on its own through various research in the U.S, i find it puzzeling that most indian or pakistani schools in kuwait don't follow the study of phonemic analysis , and their students tend to excel in reading!
hala
From: Pan Yone <mpan...@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: I2...@googlegroups.com
To: <i2...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: RE: reading wars
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:11:48 +0000
From: ode...@hotmail.com
To: I2...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: reading wars
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 04:36:15 +0000