The Pinko Propagandist

0 views
Skip to first unread message

hskiprob

unread,
Feb 25, 2015, 10:16:18 AM2/25/15
to Harriet...@googlegroups.com

The main stream media and those they serve have been demonizing the human race for centuries and millenniums. Before the printing press it was much easier to control both who became educated and what they were taught. Today, no one that desires knowledge can be stopped, as both the information is much cheaper and readily accessible.

Those is power deployed such tricks as terrorism, illusions, false flag events and propaganda as means of both obtaining power but maintaining it.

If you don’t think they are still doing it today, you are their target. It is quite easy through very simple analysis that the majority of articles and so-called news coming out of main stream media today has a specific agenda and thus is by definition, propaganda.

Pinko was a derogatory term coined in the mid-1920s for a person who was to some degree sympathetic to communism or various socialistic policies. 

Main stream media was so persuasive during this period and the populous so naïve, as an example, the American Socialist Party, as Milton and Rose Friedman pointed out in their book Free to Choose, was able to get all their Party platforms from both the 1928 and 1932 elections enacted without a single member being elected to any political position.

During the early part of the 20th century literally millions of immigrants poured into the United States looking for the better life, one that was derived ironically for the virtues of “lassie Fare” capitalism.  Like today’s immigrants, they looked for benefits from the political system as the wave of Marxist propaganda swept the world. 

What those new Americans didn’t’ realized is that the American political system and it’s nation state is no better than any other nation state, and that the reason their countries were doing so poorly, was the ruling oligarchs manipulation of the political system through social policies, just as it is in the United States.  Almost all social policies benefit special interests at the expense of everyone else. It is not that any single social policy is that bad, it is the accumulative effect and the adversarial relationship between the tax collectors/the bureaucracy/the welfare beneficiaries and the taxpayers.  There is a propensity for those in the bureaucracy, government contractors and other welfare beneficiaries, both individual and corporate to favor higher taxes in certain instances and those in the private sector to oppose taxes and regulations. People depending on their jobs and the issue, end up voting against one another to the detriment of the majority. The best example today is the public school teacher, with one of the largest and most politically powerful unions, voting for, time and time again, more government spending on education.  The United States spends more per student on education that most countries, yet we’re currently ranked outside the top 25 in the world. Interestingly, from various studies, the quality of education in the U.S. has decreased, as more and more students entered the public education system. In 1900, less that 10 percent of U.S. students went to public schools and had similar per capita drop out and vagrancy rates as today. Many Public Schools districts are experiencing catastrophic vagrancy and dropout rates today, a direct result of public education; ironically one of the mantras for increasing taxes and spending on public education at the beginning of the 20th century. In Nevada, only 57.8 percent of high school students graduated between 2009 and 2010 with the highest state, Vermont posting 91.4 percent graduating. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013309rev.pdf  -  You must also be circumspect of these statistics, as the bureaucracy from various, Counties, States and the Federal Government, depending on their motives, have been caught on numerous occasions, manipulating the facts to achieve various incentives; the things the Pinko Propagandist do not like to write or talk about. 

For decades, the U.S. populous has been force fed Marxist pinko propaganda by the main stream media under the guise of general welfare, as the political system promoted it various redistribution of wealth schemes. The United States today has a massive bureaucracy with over 90,000 different governing bodies and we are the largest debtor in world history. The accumulation of one social policy after another, stacked so high that the Internal Revenue Code is just under 10,000 pages, enforcing some 80 different taxes. Coupled with the municipalities, Counties, States and various other taxing districts such as the South Florida Water Management District, (SFWMD), we have financially handcuffed and bankrupted through excessive taxation and regulation our once thriving lassie fare capitalist system that once fostered the wealthiest per capita nation on earth.

As my father once stated, “politics is the art of being elected” and believing that the main stream media is not going to be financially influenced through political advertising is naïve. For instance, the Ad Council is a nonprofit that administers advertising campaigns for Government entities. Once you see who is partnering with the Ad Council, it leads to a maze of other none profits and government agencies marketing and advertising campaigns, most originating from taxpayer dollars. When I was a kid, it was Smoky the Bear ads paid for by the Federal Government on shown on all four major networks. Today the oligarchs use the maze of internet, major social media and main stream media to skim the money from the American taxpayer through various redistribution of wealth schemes.  The “Bully Project” is of course a partner of the Ad Council. Here is a list of second highest donor classifications to the Ad Council. All the major networks are represented in one donor class or another:

Leadership Circle ($100,000 - $149,999 ) 
Ad Council Board of Directors & Staff, AT&T, CBS Corporation, Comcast Corporation / Comcast Spotlight, Facebook, GE, Hearst Magazines, Intel Corporation, News Corporation and Fox Networks Group, Unilever US, Viacom and BET Networks, WWE                                                       

What is hard to find out is who is paying for the specific advertising campaigns and who is getting paid to actually do the advertising and marketing. For instance, the Public Service Network (PSN), owned by Media Force LLC is a Partner, who is also a partner to other non-profits and government such as Nation Public Radio (NPR).  One of their advertising campaigns was “Defending Childhood” which was funded by the Department of Justice to the tune of $3 million, for a 30 second audio and video that aired on such networks as CNN, Viacom, A&E, Fox, Clear Channel Radio and CW.

Of course who wouldn’t Defend Childhood? Right. Your tax dollars are going to a vast maze of useless media campaigns/propaganda and consultancy firms that provide mostly useless data to make it look like our politicians are a least doing their homework in an attempt to socially engineer society. 

It’s mostly one big scam to skim off tax payer dollars. From the Ad Council’s 2013 -14 annual report; http://www.adcouncil.org/About-Us/Annual-Report-2013-14, Of the $45 million in revenue, $37.5 million went to production, distribution and salaries. One has to take the time to run the maze to see just how many non-profit, for profit companies and government agencies are involved in the fleecing of America. From the Ad Council to General Electric (GE), who just so happens to own the network CNBC,  owned by NBCUniversal Group with so called sister channels such as the Golf Channel, E!, MSNBC, The Weather Channel, Esquire Network, with partnerships with Dow Jones and Company, The New York Times, Yahoo Finance, AOL Money and Finance and Thomas Reuters. They are just part of one big happy family providing you the main stream media news and commentary or should I say pinko propaganda.    

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages