REMINDER: Tomorrow - talk by Suzanne Kemmer

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sebastian Fedden

unread,
May 12, 2016, 4:37:50 AM5/12/16
to null, null, null, null, null, null, null, Eszter Szenes, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, Aet Lees, Language and Philosophy, Hiroko Komatsu, Linda Barwick, María José Ardao, Noelia Carrancio, Duk-Soo Park, Caroline Lipovsky, Linda Tsung, Wei Wang, Santi Dharmaputra, Sarah Plane, Sophie Kay, Natalia Bichurina, Tony Diller, Barbara Horvath, David Wilkins, Kenneth Reinecke Hansen, Anna Morbiato, Bill Palmer, Jakelin Troy, Arlene Harvey, Olga Gushcheva, Britt Jacobsen, Brian Paltridge, Mitchell Hobbs, Livia Gerber, Gus Wheeler, Weijian Meng, Bunty Avieson, Bruce Gardiner, Adrian Vickers, Nick Enfield, Nick Riemer, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Monika Bednarek, Ahmar Mahboob, William Foley, James Martin, Jonathon Hutchinson, Sarah Taylor, Cesar Albarran Torres, Nerida Jarkey, Susette Cooke, Antonia Rubino, Shoshana Dreyfus, Tarrin Wills, John Frow, Mark Allon, Emanuela Moretto, Peter Minter, Ian Young, Fernanda Penaloza, Carlos De Pablos Ortega, Bronwen Dyson, Mark Ledbury, Marita Bullock, Peter Kirkpatrick, Jonathan Wooding, Peter Marks, Liam Semler, David Kelly, Fiona Giles, Amanda Card, Iain Gardner, Carole Cusack, Jay Johnston, Susan Thomas, Sahar Amer, Olivier Ansart, Andrea Bandhauer, Dwi Djenar, Anthony Dracopoulos, Yingjie Guo, Ki-Sung Kwak, Anne Walsh, Jeremy Hammond, Christine Ji, Clair, William Peralta, Peter Hiscock, Ryan Schram, Stephen Brown, Linda Connor, Ase Ottosson, Katarina Ferro, Ute Eickelkamp, Yasmine Musharbash, Michael Franjieh, Yitong Ding, Gillian Cowlishaw, Magno da Silva, Koenraad Kuiper, Lorraine Towers, Pauline Phoumindr, Mark Richards, Rachel Hendery, Robert Mailhammer, Joe Blythe, Maia Ponsonnet, Georgia Carr, Fabia Andronos, Myfany Turpin

Dear colleagues,

 

Our USYD Department of Linguistics Research Seminar continues with a presentation by:

 

Assoc Prof Suzanne Kemmer, Rice University

 

Figure-Ground Reversal in Fictive Motion

 

Fri, 13 May 2016, 12.30-2.00pm

Rogers Room, John Woolley Bldg A20, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006

 

You’re welcome to bring your lunch to the talk. After the talk we’ll have our Linguistics Afternoon Tea.

 

You will find the abstract below.

 

Best,

Sebastian

 

 

Abstract

This talk is part of a collaborative project with Dr. Sai Ma, University of Auckland.

Talmy (2000) observed that language displays Figure-Ground (F-G) organization in various aspects of grammar. This attentional asymmetry is most obvious in the clausal organization of locational predicates. In The bike is near the house, one entity, the bike, is selected as the attentionally-prominent subject (cognitively speaking, a Figure); the other, the house, serves as a cognitive reference point, a Ground, in this case for location purposes. When perceptual scenes are described, such as the scene of a house and nearby bike, linguistic F-G organization most naturally aligns with the perceptual F-G organization of the scene as in the above sentence with bike as subject: The bike is both the linguistic and the perceptual Figure. But since linguistic constructions can be used to manipulate attentional focus, linguistic Figure and Ground need not align with perceptual Figure and Ground. The same perceptual scene of house and bike can be described by The house is near the bike. But this sentence is natural only in contexts where the bike, perceptually more Figure-like due to its size and movability, has characteristics that make it a useful linguistic reference point and thus a Ground. Talmy (2000:316) gives the example of a case in which the particular bike described is very famous. A famous bike in a location known to the interlocutors can reasonably serve as a landmark for locating a house we want to focus our attention on. The lack of alignment between linguistic and canonical perceptual organization is what we term Figure-Ground reversal.

 Figure-Ground reversal, it turns out, relates to fictive motion (FM) expressions in an interesting way. It will be shown that in naturally-occurring FM descriptions, F-G reversal is common in English and Chinese, exemplified in (1) and (2):

(1) On both sides of the road large trees bent forward over us

(2) 的洋楼在夜的云霄中扑迎着雪花 ‘The towering western-style building rushes at the snow in the clouds at night’

We analyze such FM examples as Figure-Ground reversal, and moreover, suggest that this pattern is part of a general interaction of FM with F-G organization.

Studies of fictive motion have so far focused on aspects of the motion event rather than the participants Figure and Ground. By observing the participants as well, we can draw generalizations that deepen our understanding of FM and relate two phenomena previously understood quite separately.

 

Reference

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.



Dr Sebastian Fedden | Lecturer in Linguistics

School of Literature, Art and Media | Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY

N367, John Woolley Bld A20 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006

T
+61 2 9351 7518  | F +61 2 9351 2434

CRICOS 00026A
This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and any attachments.
Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages