簡子杰先生的回信

[sidekick]

Thank you all for sending me the e-mail and this English version of the
open
letter. As I can't read Chinese I started to scout the web for more
info. I am
glad that there is a healthy discussion and action by bloggers. There
is a lot
of emotions, passion and colloboration of many other things which I
think proof
the point that bloggers do more then just write online diaries. Keep it
up.

The writing by Phil at
http://www.flyingchair.net/story.php?storyID=1246
provides interesting reading.

Cheers.

[Regina Yeung]

Thanks sidekick!

簡子杰 can't read Chinese! 咁當初佢點研究青少年寫Blog的?(相信他們多以中文書寫)不過相信他是有心人。

 

看了Phil的Blog，頗為同意他說的，我總覺得有些媒體即使明白聯署信的真正意思，也會在報導中(若有)編派此次運動成"懶高深Bloggers against "寫日記Bloggers"之類。因為這樣較易明白及突出啊！

 

[pig]

"Can't read Chinese"??
我地係唔係要轉寫英文=.="
一係我讀晒D blog，整個podcast俾佢啦…

[siDEKIck]

第二封回信:

Dear concern HongKongbloggers,

I read up as much as I could in English to understand since I can't read
Chinese.

Just some information for update. Prior to all the present news reporting the HK
Economic Times covered (11/4/2005 page A21) this growing blogging culture. In
the HKET mewspaper and CableTV interview I was very conscious that I give a
positive view of blogging and its potential for bringing people together. I can
assure you all that I spoke more on many other aspects of blogging and
technology. I come from the old days of Bulletin Board System (BBS) where
electronic messages are delivered by IDD calls and redistributed by posting on
a dialup BBS. The internet and web tools just make things easier but they do
the same thing - communicate and bring people together.

http://www.hku.hk/sdcsc/tkkang/digest.html
http://www.hku.hk/sdcsc/tkkang/abipaper.html

Again I hope this spirit that you all have shown can be brought forward to
another level where we can make a better world for all.

A happy weekend.

T.K. Kang

--
sidekick

My blog
http://sidekick.myblog.hk

[idiot....@gmail.com]

個回覆好得體啊，佩服！

[siDEKIck]

問題一: 假如簡先生的電腦從來都不能閱讀中文, 那他如何研究香港學生的網絡文化多年呢? 始終, 我相信, 較大部份的學生在bbs,
forum 都是使用中文的. 尤其是"網上日記"

問題二: 參加聯署的blog 大部份的編碼都是utf-8, 而不是big 5.
據我所知, 縱然他使用的電腦系統並不是中文版, 只要browser 有下載相關字型,
即可閱讀中文, 真的很難嗎?

又或是, 簡先生其實是不懂中文?
他寫的" I can't read Chinese." 是不懂中文的意思?
@_@

[黛]

我估佢係用緊o的奇怪電腦（例如好古舊o既Win98外掛中文字型靠IE5加細明體睇中文果隻呢），所以佢係「睇唔到中文」而唔係唔識睇中文。唔好笑，據我經驗越大機構係越多呢o的騎呢野，所以我先至特登俾埋英文版本佢。反而報館因為要「做生意」，就算部電腦點唔得都好，一定會睇到收到中文野。

[siDEKIck]

我邊敢笑佢!
我o係公司用o個部腦, 正正是WIN 98, e-mail software 係netscape mail.
word processor 係 LOTUS wordpro! (最近先申請到win office)
:)

BTW, 佢office 部腦睇唔到中文, 我估佢屋企o個部會得卦...
我... 斷估佢屋企有電腦卦...

豬欄, 你錄o左d 文落podcast 睇怕都冇用, 我估佢部腦係冇聲o既~
(我公司o個部之前都係冇聲o架...)

唯有寄望明天會更好, 簡生office 部腦可以睇到中文,
又或佢私人早日有睇到中文o既電腦~~ :)

[Duke of Aberdeen]

我無話可說。

[Mr. Five]

以私人身份去回復, 已經值得贊賞,
況且, 答案亦很大方.
他懂不懂中文, 並不是我們探究的範圍.

As he said: "The internet and web tools just make things easier but they do

the same thing - communicate and bring people together."

個人而言, 我對簡生的回答是完全接受.


--
MrFive
http://mrfive.blogspot.com

[keit...@gmail.com]

接受但係佢始終都要搞清楚咩係BLOG先得架。

[JL]

我都覺得佢既回覆大方得體.

佢點理解blog, 我自己就無乜所謂, 始終係佢既個人選擇.

而家起碼佢知道有人介意將blog睇成"只係"網上日記", 我相信對佢日後既理解都會有少少影響.

[Rossi Kwan King Fai [Gmail]]

其實佢肯re，已經好好架啦，大家都知，mail 唔一定要 re ，佢可以睇左就萛．

 

田

[黛]

無錯......佢可以當自己時運高的。

[黛]

以私人身份去回復 <-
因為我o地係send去佢自己個e-mail嘛。

不過我都同意佢叫做大方得體傢啦。
我o地響封信亦都無寫到e.g.
在新增點呀簡生咁咁咁會點點點，
佢依傢咁樣回覆係好正路。
除非有人e.g. 記者去follow
up件事，否則依傢咁覆都算係咁囉。

[siDEKIck]

On 5/14/05, 黛 <daisy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 以私人身份去回復 <-
> 因為我o地係send去佢自己個e-mail嘛。
<--咁佢肯覆, 即係肯以私人身份, 所以抵讚嘛~
我覺得, 大家都是一個頗能包容的大人~ :)

>
> 不過我都同意佢叫做大方得體傢啦。
> 我o地響封信亦都無寫到e.g.
> 在新增點呀簡生咁咁咁會點點點，
> 佢依傢咁樣回覆係好正路。
> 除非有人e.g. 記者去follow
> up件事，否則依傢咁覆都算係咁囉。
>

<-- 係呀! 得體o架~ 從大人角度, 收晒貨~
不過以細路心性, 我就會諗得體後面o既問題~
(即係會懷疑佢呃大話, 佢只係settle down 件事, 講兩句話"乙水"完你歡喜就算)
:p

btw, send 信俾各界, 對我而言, 已成就了某部份的"功德", 亦"完滿"
人家是否回應, 會怎看待此事, 不能控制, 毋須介懷,
但~~~~~~~~~~~~~可以成為我們茶餘飯後的話題! :p
^o^

[Duke of Aberdeen]

我幾同意小踢的話，他現在不求對錯，是想減輕破壞力，大概有請教過公關吧。:p

[siDEKIck]

剛收到簡先生第三封很長的mail, 頗為personal, 所以我不敢貿貿然放上newsgroup.
已去信問他了~~

但, 原來我猜得沒錯, 簡先生是"不能閱讀" 中文的.
如果我的英文理解得沒錯的話.

[黛]

可唔可以搵人send番封信俾佢，俾o左反應佢先，然後再慢慢拆。
依傢佢send
o左3封信黎，唔send番俾佢話：「我收到啦。」好似有o的唔禮貌。

其實我都可以send
o既，不過我怕我一時唔小心荔枝唔荔枝蘋果唔蘋果會俾人笑，影響到大家就唔好啦。（講笑咋，唔好嬲，我講真我英文真係屎傢。）

[sidekick]

我d 英文屎到爆, 不過覺得人家都沒空笑我, 所以send
了信給他~
簡生說他看過此newsgroup, 如果大家有意見給他,
可在新一篇文那邊用英文留言. (中文也可,
不過要他太太讀他聽了)

[Wilson Shum]

>
> btw, send 信俾各界, 對我而言, 已成就了某部份的"功德", 亦"完滿"
> 人家是否回應, 會怎看待此事, 不能控制, 毋須介懷,
> 但~~~~~~~~~~~~~可以成為我們茶餘飯後的話題! :p
> ^o^
>
> --

同意！

[keit...@gmail.com]

簡生回應得體係一回事（所謂得體，我同意 -
除了一點："I can't read
Chinese"），但佢在節目中所顯出的訛誤和以專家身份發言並不恰當的事實，卻不會因為他「回應得體」而變得合理。

簡生的回應中，認為自己在節目中已很謹慎地盡量提出正面訊息，我亦同意。只對他在上節目或做訪問前未深入了解事件而感到可惜。

香港的傳媒，為甚麼總是後知後覺？blog並不是科技突破，而是傳媒突破，為甚麼傳媒人對世界傳媒發展也要後知後覺？