You are right. Thanks for mentioned it, I haven't noticed by myself.
On 11 feb, 00:01, "Zack (Doc)" <
z...@tnan.net> wrote:
> It seems they "fixed" the search at the same time. I went in to
> research your post Sean and found it harder to find the duplicates
> I've previously had to do a merge with. While doing so, I discovered
> that when I type in the contact search box I'm getting matches off
> name and e-mail address, and even company I think. People complained
> that the newer version's contact search was limiting, but it seems to
> me it's gotten back to the better search they say it had before.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 17:44, Sean Murphy <
smpara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Interesting. I just checked and I see the same amendment. I read about a
> > new feature that was just rolled out, allowing us to merge duplicate
> > contacts - this change must be related to that. Since I gave up on going
> > through and deleting unhelpful Suggested Contacts a while ago, it won't
> > affect me, but perhaps if you change to a reduced function like "Old
> > Version" or "HTML" it might bring Suggested Contacts back for you, maybe?
> > Probably not, but I can't think of any other way. Perhaps you could change
> > your routine from deleting Suggested Contacts to merging Duplicate Contacts?
> > It would basically be the same thing.
>
> > -Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice...
>