Now, imagine the big, incredibly huge tail springing out from that
dog. I'm talking huge - big enough to cover the Nile River, and
wagging so much it could bring the whole state of Texas to a panic.
Such a tail would have hairs several times the size of the CNN tower,
with such big, blunt tops that you could hike on them, like a plateau,
if they hadn't been moving around so much from all that wagging.
Now image that the dog is standing upright. So...
What's underneath that ginormously biggishly hugely unbelievably - er,
you get the point - tail?
My answer would be George Bush - he really stinks. What/who do you
think is under that tail?
--
My problem is your problem
Cranky Dude
http://dude.cranky.googlepages.com/
--
"Too close for missles, I'm switching to guns."
-TopGun
My post was never intended to be for political statements. The reason
I chose George Bush was because more people are likely to know him; I
could have chosen my Uncle Terry, but know one would have any way of
knowing any possible reasons for that. If I offended you, I apologize.
So, my question is: what person/place/thing of any variety, famous or
living in a cave, do you think really stinks? It's ok, you can pick
me. But it has to be a different person/place/thing each post.
Another possibility that's high on the ranking in my opinion is Las
Vegas; most people I've met have their own wastebaskets, so why can't
they put their money in those instead of the casinos?
On 6/13/06, nevadagirl13942 <nevadag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> wtf?
That suggests that my intent was to illustrate where Bush came from or
something crazy like that. The answer to that one is obvious: he came
from Barbara's stomach.
Let's try a different combination of words, since you obviously didn't
get my first clarification.
Bush was merely an example of what might be under the tail, not meant
to represent the entirety of what could be there. I gave 3 other
examples as well. Now, what's your example?
wtf?!?!
a million or so ppl a year disagree with you!! :))
You've STILL missed the point! Or maybe it's your turn to clarify,
because it sounds like you're talking about the political aspect of my
post, which wasn't the intent behind my post in the first place.
Talk about stifling one's creative talents...
Now, most people I understand, even if I disagree with them. But this
post I can't even comprehend. I am doing it on, err... my own topic.