When Workplace Styles Collide
by Bobbie Little | Chief Learning Officer
While many believe conflicts are due to personality issues, conflicts
between employees often can be attributed to colliding work styles. Conflicts
often occur between:
a) Intuitive versus factual employees
b) Logic-based versus people-focused decision makers
c) Pressure-prompted individuals versus early starters
For instance, employees depend on their co-workers to get the job done, so
if a pressure-prompted individual and an early starter work on the same project,
stress and conflict likely will ensue. The issue can escalate into missed
deadlines, botched opportunities or even project disasters if things go too
far.
Consider the following scenario: An energy company is expanding its solar
capabilities. The business development manager is responsible for early resource
allocation. The planning manager needs this information to create a plan for his
team to execute. What happens if the business development manager has a
pressure-prompted work style, and the planning manager is an early
starter?
The planning manager will be frustrated, since she can't begin her job
until she has the early resource allocation results. She might pester the
business development manager to get things moving. This will only annoy him,
since he sees no need to significantly beat a deadline. Consequently, when the
planning manager finally gets the information, she may be too stressed to
organize the best plan for her team.
This type of conflict arises over and over again between managers with
opposing styles, and can create a toxic work environment not only for the
managers, but also for their support staff.
Company leaders should recognize they likely can't change employees, but
they can help them flex their respective styles more effectively. These leaders
should help individuals recognize their different styles, focus on a common
goal, and make sure their teams are aligned to meet the goal.
Many companies turn to conflict resolution coaching for a solution, which
has five main points:
1. Be self-aware.
For example, pressure-prompted individuals and early starters often are
equally distributed within a workforce. It's important to identify who is who in
order to construct workarounds that will enable these employees to work
effectively together.
2. Understand impact.
It's critical to understand the impact of one's work style on co-workers;
it's also critical to understand that style, not personality, causes conflict.
This insight often provides motivation to find a solution.
3. Focus on a common goal.
Opposing leaders can create an open, trusting dialogue about their
different approaches when they need to meet the same goal.
4. Establish shared metrics.
Regardless of work style, defining shared metrics can help leaders commit
to them, much like setting a common goal.
5. Find middle ground.
Individuals can't change their work styles, nor can they change a
co-worker's style. But they need to realize that if they aren't supporting their
co-workers, anxiety levels may rise.
When employees with different styles learn how to work together, the end
results are often better than singular efforts. For example, pressure-prompted
individuals usually are great in emergency situations or when something changes;
they can marshal resources quickly and perform well under pressure.
Alternatively, early starters can provide great structure and a clear road map
for a project, which helps teams better manage their time. By harnessing both
styles, companies can leverage a joint methodology that will lead to better
business execution.
[About the Author: Bobbie Little is the director of worldwide executive
coaching services for PDI Ninth House.]
Regards,
Harvinder