--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Geodesic Help" Google Group
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GeodesicHelp...@googlegroups.com
--
To post to this group, send email to geodes...@googlegroups.com
--
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/geodesichelp?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geodesic Help Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geodesichelp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/2ae93efa-c2b4-489a-b2c0-6a9bdc9e97fcn%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAG0f9gTCT6MuNsRRfrx82_J6cOx1r1GYQMVeZQOLK%3DQjbUxhDw%40mail.gmail.com.
My own opinion is that the failure stems from
* pre-condition of extreme cold during the storm,
* increasing the sensitivity to stress-fracture
* decreasing the material's elasticity
* structure already "under load" from weight of snow, but likely
not excessively so
* over-stress event triggered by high-wind gusts adding transient dynamic load to the pre-existing static snow load
Very sad to see that it failed, but maybe exposure to UV also might have had a factor in undermining the integrity/elasticity of the structure.
Does the above sound right?
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAG0f9gTCT6MuNsRRfrx82_J6cOx1r1GYQMVeZQOLK%3DQjbUxhDw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAHkq9YMQDwwN%2BJhmaQtFymXRoguuG1ESx7_x25q%3DvqVAJphB0Q%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CABWq%3Di6fgfte_aY%2BH%2BM3thwiqgp5BemGpdpYg7MQ_8bt39O7MQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAOkvEDmnWhvpSLZoZdWbLbPdzwfYFR0wMQaN6xqUxY1y8%3DRN%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com.