Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Cort Johnson

unread,
Jan 10, 2010, 6:09:12 PM1/10/10
to Mail Delivery Subsystem

In this quick breaking edition we take a look at the first XMRV Replication attemptXMRV Replication Study for CFS. Originating from the Imperial College in the UK (with patients supplied by Simon Wessely), the study found zero (that's zero!) evidence of XMRV in 186 CFS patients. First the CAA leapt in with their critiques and then the Whittemore Peterson Institute did. (The media ignored both).  
 
Read out why it might make sense to pay attention to this study and why it may not in this edition of Phoenix Rising. 
 
Plus check out the new What's New In CFS page as the Forums expand and some additions to the website and blog.  
 
 :)

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

    C...@knology.net

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 <C...@knology.net>: sorry, no mailbox here by that name (550 - chkuser) (state 14).

----- Original message -----

MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.7.10 with SMTP id 10mr1227402wag.90.1263006462126; Fri, 08
       Jan 2010 19:07:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8353f1321001071906n3b5...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8353f1321001071906n3b5...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:07:41 -0800
Message-ID: <8353f1321001081907v46c...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Phoenix Rising: the Brits Smack XMRV...or Do They?
From: Cort Johnson <phoen...@gmail.com>
To: cort johnson <phoen...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e648afba86449a047cb29bad

> In this quick breaking edition we take a look at the first XMRV
> Replication attempt[image: XMRV Replication Study for CFS]. Originating
> from the Imperial College in the UK (with patients supplied by Simon
> Wessely), the study found zero (that's zero!) evidence of XMRV in 186 CFS
> patients. First the CAA leapt in with their critiques and then the
> Whittemore Peterson Institute did. (The media ignored both).  Read out why
> it might make sense to pay attention to this study and why it may not in
> this edition of Phoenix Rising.
>
> Check it out here. http://aboutmecfs.org/Rsrch/XMRVImperialCollege.aspx
>
> Che. -- Cort John
>
> Phoenix Rising  - An ME/CFS Website at http://aboutmecfs.org.
> Proudly affiliated with ME-CFS Community at http://ME-CFSCommunity.com
>
>


--
Cort Johnson

Phoenix Rising  - An ME/CFS Website at http://aboutmecfs.org.
Proudly affiliated with ME-CFS Community at http://ME-CFSCommunity.com



--
Cort Johnson

Phoenix Rising  - An ME/CFS Website at http://aboutmecfs.org.
Proudly affiliated with ME-CFS Community at http://ME-CFSCommunity.com

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages