hwallba...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Well, to me this is still falling into the category of 'nice try'.
>
> I'll write up a bit more of a review later, but so far there's a
> number of negative points that are making me think of taking it back:
>
> * Very poor composite video. I know its probably more of a device to
> connect using component connection, but I don't have that option on
> the TV I want to use it on. RGB or even sVideo out would be nice.
>
>
When you say "poor" do you mean noisy or colour balance.
I found I had to adjust the source of the comp video and the ME1 to get
a good result - the source a Sat TV box was over driving the output and
I had to tell it to reduce its output (not something
you can do on all boxes) and then balance the colour, contrast etc.
After this is was as good as RGB.
> * Very slow and clunky front main menu interface. Better with the
> later software and preview disabled, but still damn awkward to get to
> anywhere - not helped by the shite quality remote that needs to be
> held almost 6" away.
>
>
The remote is bad, but mostly because it is slow to respond and imprecise. M
Mine works from a reasonable distance - 6ft/2m easily.
And I agree about the interface but again the new software is a lot better.
> * Really, really, really slow file transfers over the network. One of
> the reasons I got this was to save me having to burn stuff I download
> onto a DVD and the playing them on my (DivX enabled) DVD player.
> Seeing as I can burn a file to a disc quicker than I can transfer it
> to the ME1 I'm beginning to wonder about it. It also takes the piss
> somewhat when I can download a file almost as quick from the Internet
> (20MBit/s) nearly as quick as I can transfer it to the ME1 (30MBit/s
> if your lucky).
>
>
Agreed but you can just start it downloading and walk away.
With DVDs you have to insert a disc and reload when the disc is full.
mikej