Spencer --
Good to see that you're interested in and presumably concerned
about this. There is not much question that fraud has been committed, in
fact over and over again since roughly the time of your birth. I would caution,
however, against identifying any apparent beneficiary (Clinton, GW
Bush, hundreds of down-ballot electees, e.g.) as the perpetrator.
Electoral fraud favoring Hillary Clinton is not necessarily "Hillary Clinton's
electoral fraud."
There is a parade of bad actors who, if they disagree about other things,
are unanimous in their determination that the likes of Bernie Sanders not be
elevated to the presidency. Electoral fraud, especially the most direct species
which is manipulation of the computerized counting process, is dependent on
means and access as well as motive and a full suspension of ordinary ethics. The
evidence indicates that it has been occurring with stunning regularity long
before this election and in thousands of contests in which Hillary Clinton and
her backers had no stake or involvement.
If you want a more likely perp, you might begin by examining the
activities of Karl Rove, the late Mike Connell, the Urosevich brothers, the
vendors (Dominion, ES&S, at one time Diebold, et al) and their shadowy
satellite subsidiaries (LHS, Triad, Command Central, etc.). This is a vastly
bigger story than the anomalies of the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries,
though that's a good starting point as it appears that the rigging has been
particularly egregious, though not necessarily, as I said, by Clinton or her
campaign.
Wishing you the best --
Jonathan Simon
Executive Director, Election Defense Alliance