[EE4217] Workshop 1 Feedback Comments and Scores
0 views
Skip to first unread message
ADC
Apr 12, 2005, 9:07:15 AM4/12/05
to EE4...@googlegroups.com
Dear Class
Please find below the Workshop 1 feedback comments and scores. I congratulate the entire class on the overall high effort and work. The number in front of each comment refers to the group number.
ADC
EK
1. Good try to use AI. The server handles all processing. In case that there are a few clients, the server handles all. As the number of client is increased, the burden of the server has been increased. For real time multi-user game, distributed system is more proper.
2. "Fun" is a very important factor in game. As my opinion, the real 3D model and animation makes the game more fun.
3. Good idea, but unreasonable rule has to be modified for hitting ship.
4. Making various functions is good, especially collision detection, but 1 frame rate is not good enough for real time application.
5. Synchronization is quite difficult problem for multi-user real time game. Your effort to solve the problem is so nice trial.
6. I appreciate your attempt to settle down network problem because normally everyone tends to avoid
7. I am sorry that I could not see your final results, which you intended at first.
XK
1. Good concept. And it's great to see the simple AI been implemented in the game.
2. Creative game idea. It is the key of the game design. However, there is still space for improvement.
3. Good game concept, but some further improvement can be made in the actual development.
4. It should be a good game development experience for you. Improvement needed to make it run real-time.
5. Very good game concept, and well programmed. It's good to see the various features been implemented here.
6. Good game design, and well done in the real-time part.
7. Good game concept. Further improvement needed for the game complexity and graphics.
LW
1. Nice concept and very good to try AI in your game. The game feature needs improve.
2. Very intersting idea and beautiful interface graphic is designed. It seems you get the key of how to design a good game.
3. A novel concept, it's better to make the ship can be moved after intialization. This will make the game more interesting.
4. A good try to improve the exist game, but the implemation need to enhance
5. Excellent work to achieve the synchronization and support the most number of users. Very good idea to introduce the helper to this game. Nice interface, graphics, and backgroud music.
6. Continue the age-invader work, finish several new functions.
7. A novel concept, the implementation and game featured need to improve
SZ
1. Nice concept and it is amazing that you tried to apply AI to the game even it is not one of the requirements.
2. Crazy but definite the best idea. It seems that you guys have known quite well about game kernels. I hope it could come out with a two-page poster publication at related conferences.
3. A novel concept but the complexity of the game could be further improved.
4. A good try to implement existing game but 1 fps is definitely not real-time.
5. Excellent work to achieve the synchronization and support the most number of users. Diligent work to discover and solve the latency problems. Novel concept, nice interface, graphics, and background music
6. Continue the concept of Age Invader and implement several parts which we haven't done. Will be very good for us as a reference.
7. A novel concept but the game features could be further improved.
ADC
1. Very good + original idea. The battleship game did some intelligent logic
2. Very good technically, simple but creative
3. Good game play, a little rough, can be more logical
4. Technically good, nice design and good idea for the game. It should be smoother.
5. Technically good, except some small bugs, very good play + interface
6. Good real-time motion. Fast, make good efforts to the elderly focus.
7. Good, works basically, but not very creative and interfaces are not so intuitive
Group 1
LOH KIT WENG, ADRIAN TAN PANG JIN
83
Group 2
LOW HIANG YONG YOUNG KAI YIP
91
Group 3
LIEW WEE CHANG MONG YUQIN
77
Group 4
NAGANIVETHA THIYAGARAJAH NIROSHARN AMARASINGHE
77
Group 5
LOW WAI YEE ONG WEI SIANG,LENA
96
Group 6
HAN JIANWEI WANG KAI YANG
85
Group 7
KWAN KON LEONG CHONG CHEN SENG
74
--
Posted by ADC to EE4217 at 4/12/2005 08:42:00 PM
Please find below the Workshop 1 feedback comments and scores. I congratulate the entire class on the overall high effort and work. The number in front of each comment refers to the group number.
ADC
EK
1. Good try to use AI. The server handles all processing. In case that there are a few clients, the server handles all. As the number of client is increased, the burden of the server has been increased. For real time multi-user game, distributed system is more proper.
2. "Fun" is a very important factor in game. As my opinion, the real 3D model and animation makes the game more fun.
3. Good idea, but unreasonable rule has to be modified for hitting ship.
4. Making various functions is good, especially collision detection, but 1 frame rate is not good enough for real time application.
5. Synchronization is quite difficult problem for multi-user real time game. Your effort to solve the problem is so nice trial.
6. I appreciate your attempt to settle down network problem because normally everyone tends to avoid
7. I am sorry that I could not see your final results, which you intended at first.
XK
1. Good concept. And it's great to see the simple AI been implemented in the game.
2. Creative game idea. It is the key of the game design. However, there is still space for improvement.
3. Good game concept, but some further improvement can be made in the actual development.
4. It should be a good game development experience for you. Improvement needed to make it run real-time.
5. Very good game concept, and well programmed. It's good to see the various features been implemented here.
6. Good game design, and well done in the real-time part.
7. Good game concept. Further improvement needed for the game complexity and graphics.
LW
1. Nice concept and very good to try AI in your game. The game feature needs improve.
2. Very intersting idea and beautiful interface graphic is designed. It seems you get the key of how to design a good game.
3. A novel concept, it's better to make the ship can be moved after intialization. This will make the game more interesting.
4. A good try to improve the exist game, but the implemation need to enhance
5. Excellent work to achieve the synchronization and support the most number of users. Very good idea to introduce the helper to this game. Nice interface, graphics, and backgroud music.
6. Continue the age-invader work, finish several new functions.
7. A novel concept, the implementation and game featured need to improve
SZ
1. Nice concept and it is amazing that you tried to apply AI to the game even it is not one of the requirements.
2. Crazy but definite the best idea. It seems that you guys have known quite well about game kernels. I hope it could come out with a two-page poster publication at related conferences.
3. A novel concept but the complexity of the game could be further improved.
4. A good try to implement existing game but 1 fps is definitely not real-time.
5. Excellent work to achieve the synchronization and support the most number of users. Diligent work to discover and solve the latency problems. Novel concept, nice interface, graphics, and background music
6. Continue the concept of Age Invader and implement several parts which we haven't done. Will be very good for us as a reference.
7. A novel concept but the game features could be further improved.
ADC
1. Very good + original idea. The battleship game did some intelligent logic
2. Very good technically, simple but creative
3. Good game play, a little rough, can be more logical
4. Technically good, nice design and good idea for the game. It should be smoother.
5. Technically good, except some small bugs, very good play + interface
6. Good real-time motion. Fast, make good efforts to the elderly focus.
7. Good, works basically, but not very creative and interfaces are not so intuitive
Group 1
LOH KIT WENG, ADRIAN TAN PANG JIN
83
Group 2
LOW HIANG YONG YOUNG KAI YIP
91
Group 3
LIEW WEE CHANG MONG YUQIN
77
Group 4
NAGANIVETHA THIYAGARAJAH NIROSHARN AMARASINGHE
77
Group 5
LOW WAI YEE ONG WEI SIANG,LENA
96
Group 6
HAN JIANWEI WANG KAI YANG
85
Group 7
KWAN KON LEONG CHONG CHEN SENG
74
--
Posted by ADC to EE4217 at 4/12/2005 08:42:00 PM
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages