A few thoughts...
Qiu et al.'s Figure 3a, the results of their TWiG analysis, have Compsognathus in their Sinosauropterygidae, which obviously cannot be.
Note both of these specimens have been published previously, though the authors don't mention it. Sinosauropteryx lingyuanensis was the subject of Lingham-Soliar et al. (2007), while Huadanosaurus was called Sinosauropteryx in Zhang et al. (2010).
Did nobody even try when drawing the skulls in Figure 3? I love how going from d to c to b, the articulation with the neck gets higher and higher. D? That's about right. C? Going through the supraoccipital. B? Hope your nuchal crest has a foramen magnum. The specimen numbers of c and d are flipped, btw.
Needless to say I'm not optimistic about this paper's accuracy.
Mickey Mortimer
References-
Lingham-Soliar, Feduccia and Wang, 2007. A new Chinese specimen
indicates that 'protofeathers' in the Early Cretaceous theropod
dinosaur Sinosauropteryx are degraded collagen fibres.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 274, 1823-1829.
Zhang, Kearns, Orr, Benton, Zhou, Johnson, Xu and Wang, 2010.
Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and
birds. Nature. 463, 1075-1078.