Plesiosaur gastroliths + marine vertebrates from Cretaceous of Chile + giant caimans from Miocene in South America

32 views
Skip to first unread message

Ben Creisler

unread,
Aug 28, 2024, 1:45:39 PMAug 28
to DinosaurMa...@googlegroups.com
Ben Creisler

Some recent mainly reptile papers:


Free pdf:

Donald M. Henderson (2024)
Lost, hidden, broken, cut-estimating and interpreting the shapes and masses of damaged assemblages of plesiosaur gastroliths.
PeerJ 12:e17925
doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17925
https://peerj.com/articles/17925/


Background

Gastroliths are stones of uncertain purpose that are commonly found inside the rib cages of plesiosaur fossils worldwide. Gastroliths from four Alberta (Canada) plesiosaurs were studied to determine both their shapes and masses, and their mass fractions relative to body mass. One animal’s set of gastroliths was 100% complete and fully visible, but the others showed varying degrees of loss, damage or obscuration, so estimations of their original states were needed.

Methods

The studied animals were: Albertonectes vanderveldei, Fluvionectes sloanae, Nichollssaura borealis and Wapuskanectes betsynichollsae. The animals come from three different palaeoenvironments: open marine, near shore marine, and fluvial. Gastrolith shapes were classified as either xiphoid, cylindrical, discoidal or spherical based on observed and/or estimated dimensions. Although not all methods could be applied in all cases, gastrolith shapes and masses were estimated four different ways: (1) direct measurement and weighing of a subset and predicting the properties of the remaining obscured and hidden stones; (2) measuring triaxial ellipsoid dimensions of free stones to calculate volumes and multiplying by the mass density of chert; (3) measuring two visible triaxial dimensions of embedded stones, estimating the hidden third dimension three different ways, and then determining volumes and masses by calculation; and (4) predicting the density and mass of a densely packed cluster of small gastroliths using geometrical arguments.

Results

Total gastrolith mass never exceeded 0.2% of body mass in any plesiosaur, and is consistent with the idea that the amounts of gastroliths recovered with plesiosaurs would be ineffective as ballast. The largest plesiosaur in the sample had the largest single gastrolith and total gastrolith mass increases with body size. The shape characteristics of the gastroliths were different for different environments, but compositionally they are dominated by black cherts. A possible common source for the gastroliths was identified for the two geographically close and near-contemporanous Nichollssaura and Wapuskanectes.

====

Rodrigo A. Otero (2024)
Review of two marine vertebrate assemblages from the Arauco Basin (central Chile) reveals diversity changes throughout the Maastrichtian
Cretaceous Research 105996
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2024.105996
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667124001691


Upper Cretaceous vertebrate records from Chile are mostly known by historical mentions with unknown repositories and uncertain stratigraphic provenance. This contribution reviews and complements two marine vertebrate assemblages from the Upper Cretaceous of central Chile, which were part of the ancient Arauco Basin. The oldest assemblage (lower Maastrichtian) comprises abundant condrichthyans referred to Carcharias gracilis, Odontaspis cf. winkleri, Scapanorhynchus sp., Centrophoroides appendiculatus, Squatina sp., Cretorectolobus sp., Orectolobidae indet., Paraorthacodus sp., Ischyrhiza chilensis and Biropristis landbecki, which adds to the previously reported ocurrences of Echinorhinus sp. and Myledaphus araucanus. In addition, chimeroids referred to as Edaphodon kawai and remains of a leatherback turtle referable to Mesodermochelys sp. are here described, the latter being its first occurrence outside Japan. The younger assemblage (upper Maastrichtian) includes similar chondrichthyans and a higher diversity of marine reptiles, including plesiosaurians (Aristonectes sp., Aristonectinae indet., and Elasmosauridae indet.), sea turtles (Pancheloniidae indet.) and diverse mosasaurs (Halisaurus sp., Tylosaurinae indet., and the first local occurrence of Plioplatecarpinae indet.). Throughout the Maastrichtian, the local marine vertebrates likely suffered a declination in abundance but a rise in diversity, with evidence of a marked alteration in middle levels of the trophic web during the upper Maastricthtian. This fauna shows a main influence from the northern hemisphere (especially from the Western Interior Sea), acquiring a more marked Weddellian influence during the end of the Maastrichtian. The studied material allows a better understanding of the Upper Cretaceous vertebrate marine fauna in lower latitudes of the southeastern Pacific.

==========
==========


Paula Bona, Francisco Barrios, Martín Daniel Ezcurra, María Victoria Fernandez Blanco & Giovanne Mendes Cidade (2024)
New taxa of giant caimans from the southernmost hyperdiverse wetlands of the South American late Miocene
Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 22(1): 2375027
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2024.2375027
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2024.2375027



Here we present a comparative anatomical study of large late Miocene alligatorids of Argentina (Ituzaingó Formation), in which we analyse their taxonomy, morphological disparity, and phylogenetic relationships. ‘Caiman lutescens’ and Caiman gasparinae are two giant Miocene Argentinean caimanines that are assigned to the genus Caiman. ‘Caiman lutescens’ was originally described based on the large size of several isolated cranial and postcranial elements. In this study we consider that the lectotype of ‘C. lutescens’, an articulated left premaxilla and maxilla (MACN-Pv 5416), is morphologically indistinguishable from rostral morphotypes present in other jacarean caimanines, like Caiman latirostris and Caiman wannlangstoni, and therefore ‘C. lutescens’ is here considered a nomen dubium while MACN-Pv 5416 is an indeterminate Jacarea. A partial skull table, MACN-Pv 13551, was originally and historically referred to ‘C. lutescens’, and even wrongly considered its holotype, but it is here redescribed and reinterpreted as the holotype of a new genus and species. Additionally, after the comparative anatomical study of the holotype of C. gasparinae (MLP-Pv 73-IV-15-1), we conclude that it shows a distinctive combination of skull morphological features that allows it to be distinguished from other caimanines, including extant Caiman species. This situation and the results of the phylogenetic analyses lead us to erect a new genus for this species, which results in a new nomenclatorial combination. These new results support the idea that the alligatorid assemblages of the South American late Miocene wetlands were highly diverse at high latitudes (c. 30–35°S), as evidenced by the taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity present in the crocodylian assemblage of the Ituzaingó Formation in Paraná. The close relationship between the two new taxa + Mourasuchus spp. with Purussaurus spp. recovered in the present study reinstates the question of how to define the Caiman genus, as well as when and where it originated. 



=====
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages