Hi everyone,
I recently completed a written piece exploring an alternative to the traditional “hatchet jaw” and “flesh grazing” hypotheses regarding Allosaurus feeding behavior.
While the classic interpretation suggests a downward striking method, I propose that the skull’s structure may support a different behavior entirely—a latch-and-hold strategy, where Allosaurus clamped onto prey and withstood resistance, much like Komodo dragons or modern big cats.
The theory is grounded in:
• The shock-absorbing design of the skull
• The bowed jaw and flexible cervical vertebrae
• Fossil evidence of healed injuries, possibly indicating close-quarters struggles
• Comparisons with modern analogs and biomechanical plausibility
I’ve attached a short summary below and would be happy to send the full illustrated article with references to anyone interested.
Thanks in advance for your time—and for all the insightful discussion that happens here.
Best,
Anders Johnson
Science Writer and paleo-enthusiast.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dinosaur Mailing Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to DinosaurMailingG...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/DinosaurMailingGroup/3cbaaf8d-9e0d-4467-afae-fd3a1f8c05f9n%40googlegroups.com.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: tho...@umd.edu Phone: 301-405-4084
Principal Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Office: CHEM 1225B, 8051 Regents Dr., College Park MD 20742
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/
Phone: 301-405-6965
Fax: 301-314-9661
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Office: Centreville 1216, 4243 Valley Dr., College Park MD 20742
http://www.geol.umd.edu/sgc
Fax: 301-314-9843
Mailing Address:
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
8000 Regents Drive
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-4211 USA
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/DinosaurMailingGroup/CAHQFgpqihLFSUD0m2eZVZXfvqq1hLKy1XufAEMYW5x2QQTePVQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Strangulation, as it were? Going only by what's been posted in the abstract, what prey size is being assumed? Or perhaps rather, maximum size? Smaller sizes could have been handled by shaking (such as my Aussie does with his toys), larger sizes would have to be held on to until it died…