MPC-D 100/764 sensu Hone & Watabe 2010 vs. sensu Dewaele et al. 2015

[Sarah Tolsma]

Hello group,

I'm currently looking at two Saurolophus papers: Dewaele et al. 2015 ("Perinatal Specimens of Saurolophus angustirostris (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae), from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia") and Hone et al. 2010 ("New information on scavenging and selective feeding behaviour of tyrannosaurids").

Both are using specimen "MPC-D 100/764" to refer to two significantly different items: Hone refers to a largely complete articular adult, while Dewaele refers to a collection of perinatal individuals. This seems like a true ID mix-up or collision, but I cannot find any errata or corrections for either paper.

Does anyone know if a correction was issued and/or what the correct specimen IDs for both papers actually are?

Thanks!

Sarah Tolsma