Hello all,
From your emails which I have read, you
all seem to know each other.
I am glad to participate within the
group.
Robert Link suggested that the CoCo group might be
helpful.I wrote a paper discussing global
civilization and the biosphere in which it
is embedded as a complex adaptive
system--indeed one that is not especially
adaptive at this time. It is a
qualitative discussion and I would like to
add a quantitative dimension to
the extent possible. So, I am seeking helpful input.
I do think it is not all that easy to apply or
adapt a quantitative measure --
statistical or computational--if one does not have
a familiarity with the subject.
Nothing ventured; nothing gained and neither you
nor I have anything to lose.
my paper is "A Case Study of a Complex Adaptive
Systems Theory, Sustainable Global.
Global Governance: The Singular Challenge of the
Twenty-first Century."
The paper can more easily be accessed by Googling
my name.
The basis of a quantitative framework would seem to begin
with properties of a complex
adaptive system (CAS).Such properties include: 1) a threshold of dense
causal
interconnectivity leading to non-linear behavior--a complexity threshold--as I
call it ;
2) emergence, e.g., behavior which may
produce an international governance system
(sometimes referred to as an
international system of governance networks) that extends beyond
the narrow self-interest of our anarchic strong
nation system; 3) hypothetical chaotic scenarios;
4) scenarios leading to a hypothetical phase
transition, i.e., proximate, sustainable global governance;
5) a point of no return or of very tragic
consequences (Stuart Kauffman's term "complexity catastrophe"),
e.g., James Hansen's somber prediction in
2006 that we have fewer than ten years to correct our energy
policies and that if we don't, our "current
"business as usual" practices will produce a 35%
increase of
carbon emissions by 2015,
The first property - a threshold of dense causal
interconnectivity- is quite intuitive. Such thresholds exist
between and within
nations and societies, i.e., technological advances in communication and
transportation that have
contributed to the globalization of the economy,
but, as well, thresholds between civilization and the
biosphere
that have contributed to global warming, loss
of biodiversity, etc., and thresholds between ecosystems.
Indices of such thresholds should be quite
manageable to put together. One can not do everything,
however. A
computational simulation of the global political
system and the biosphere in which it is a part--
C.S. Holling's "panarchy"-- is probably beyond
anything I should attempt. Something on a smaller scale
would seem to be reasonable.
Comments will be appreciated.
Bennett Stark