Groups
Sign in
Groups
大汉大家
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
周末会谈提议
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Mike
unread,
Apr 10, 2008, 1:26:53 AM
4/10/08
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 中华传统道德文明观
最近网上看到不少夫妻关系紧张的话题,我建议探讨家庭和睦的经验。中华传统是非常注重家庭的。
无邪,看看能否找到论语在家庭关系方面的章节?
罗克
unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 10:53:18 PM
4/12/08
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 中华传统道德文明观
我对这个题目无异议。但在这之前可不可以讨论一下帮金晶告法国政府渎职的可能性?
shine Tsu
unread,
Apr 14, 2008, 11:15:30 AM
4/14/08
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Chinese...@googlegroups.com
我对这个题目无异议。但在这之前可不可以讨论一下帮金晶告法国政府渎职的可能性?
------------------------------
突发事件,也没死人受伤,怕告不了
在 08-4-13,罗克<
xiao...@stanford.edu
> 写道:
> 我对这个题目无异议。但在这之前可不可以讨论一下帮金晶告法国政府渎职的可能性?
>
>
> >
>
罗克
unread,
Apr 16, 2008, 3:45:59 AM
4/16/08
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 中华传统道德文明观
Shine的意见很关键。法国政府的责任是保护火炬手。巴黎火炬接力如此混乱,说他们渎职不算过分。金晶没受伤到是个难点。所以我们要咨询懂法律的人,
甚至律师讨论立案的可能性。原则就是不能让中立的人觉得金晶无理取闹。
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages