When bio mCDR went too far?

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Greg Rau

unread,
Oct 4, 2025, 4:23:32 AM (4 days ago) Oct 4
to Carbon Dioxide Removal
The Overlooked Piece of the Carbon Cycle That Froze the Planet by Silvia Pineda-Munoz, PhD - Climate Ages




Image-1.jpg


“ When all that plankton died, they sank, carrying carbon to the seafloor. Normally, that burial would be good news as it locks carbon away for ages. But in a warmer, busier ocean, oxygen levels plummeted. Low oxygen meant phosphorus wasn’t staying buried; it kept recycling back into the water, fueling yet more plankton blooms.”

GR What I don’t get is how P (and other bio-essential elements?) recycles in the ocean under low O2 while C doesn’t.  Anyway, if P is the key, should we then bulldoze guano off those bird-covered islands (and eliminate fossil fuel use) to save the planet?

Michael Hayes

unread,
Oct 5, 2025, 12:50:59 AM (3 days ago) Oct 5
to Greg Rau, Carbon Dioxide Removal
Greg, et al.

Any coastal offshore mixed CDR, SRM, water, energy, nutrient production platform will likely attract lots of sea birds. Getting the birds to roost on them might open up a guano supply. Such a mixed use platform system was proposed by a group of multiple federal agencies around two years ago. 

Yet, here we are.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Carbon Dioxide Removal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to CarbonDioxideRem...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/5750698A-989B-4BC7-BE1A-20730CD6E5D4%40sbcglobal.net.
Image-1.jpg

steve.rackley

unread,
Oct 6, 2025, 1:03:46 PM (yesterday) Oct 6
to Carbon Dioxide Removal
If 
{the "offshore mixed CDR, SRM, water, energy, nutrient production platform" is sufficient to "attract lots of sea birds"}
then 
{it seems unlikely that their additional nutrient input will be pivotal.}
endif

Michael Hayes

unread,
Oct 6, 2025, 8:51:39 PM (22 hours ago) Oct 6
to steve.rackley, Carbon Dioxide Removal
Steve, et al.,

Apologies, I was not claiming that the increased seabird population, due to increased industrial, or mCDR, activity, would be "pivotal" to CDR. I simply pointed out that there would be, beyond any doubt, an increased seabird population around such platforms. 

If multi-purpose mCDR platforms were used as the 'pivotal', or primary, CDR method for ~10 GtC/yr, one could look forward to a robust rebound from the 70% loss of seabirds that we now see, and likely a robust rebound of many of the threatened aquatic surface life in our coastal waters.

Fish Accumulator Devices, or anchored rafts, are one of the earliest known forms of community scale fishing, and FADs are also currently being used to help stop large drag net ships from raping traditional coastal fishing grounds off of Somalia and other sites.

The concept of a global scale deployment of mCDR qualified water/ energy/nutrient production FADs is not simple, yet I'm far from the first to propose it. Last year, at this time of year, most federal agencies were directed to make it happen. 

Best regards



 


Brian Cady

unread,
6:17 PM (27 minutes ago) 6:17 PM
to Michael Hayes, steve.rackley, Carbon Dioxide Removal
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages