 | | | | Links to recent scientific papers, web posts, upcoming events, job opportunities, podcasts, and event recordings, etc. on Carbon Dioxide Removal TechnologySchematic representation of the overall perturbation of the global carbon cycle caused by anthropogenic activities, averaged globally for the decade 2015–2024. The CDR estimate is for the year 2024 (Source)JUMP TO SECTIONTHIS WEEK’S TOP CDR UPDATESTop stories to look for in this week’s issue: Green Finance Institute launched its CDR Catalyst, unlocking a $1M+ loan for Restord’s UK biochar project from Oxbury Bank, with support from Terraset and Milkywire. Planet Savers secured ¥100M in grants from Mitsui’s Co-creation Fund. EU invites feedback by 22 May on CRCF rules for carbon storage in buildings using bio-based materials. Google & Frontier published guidelines on combining CDR with superpollutant abatement. Cascade Climate launched the Bedrock Initiative to scale ERW research globally. Urban Future Lab & Greentown Boston will host a C2V Initiative Year 5 Final Showcase on 3rd June. Wren launched its 2026 RFP, offering up to $500K for ARR, blue carbon, and methane reduction projects. The European Commission has opened a consultation on draft CBAM rules that would recognise Article 6 credits when calculating the carbon price paid in exporting countries. Deadline: 10 June 2026 UK Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) selected 15 DAC projects to receive £55 million in pilot funding. CRIA and BioFlux released a white paper identifying biochar as a major scalable CDR pathway for India, estimating up to 0.45 GtCO₂ annual removal potential by 2030 and a $45B+ market opportunity.
Read on to unpack more updates: This newsletter is free to read, but not free to produce. Please consider a paid subscription to support our independent reporting. Donate < $10 Get 20% off a group subscription COMMERCIAL NEWS RESEARCH PAPERSAuthors: Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O’Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, et al.Synopsis: This paper synthesizes methods and datasets used to quantify the global carbon budget, including fossil emissions, land-use change emissions, atmospheric CO₂ growth, and ocean and land carbon sinks. It shows that in 2024, total anthropogenic CO₂ emissions rose to about 11.6 ± 0.9 GtC yr⁻¹, with atmospheric CO₂ reaching 422.8 ppm, while land and ocean sinks absorbed a large fraction of emissions but left a remaining budget imbalance. The study highlights persistent uncertainties—especially in land-use change emissions, northern land fluxes, and ocean uptake—while confirming a near-consistent long-term carbon budget with remaining discrepancies at annual to decadal scales.
Authors: Zulma Lopez-Reyes, Wesley Hopwood, Jonathan Jones, Rod Wing, Raffaella Sordella, Carlos Grande & Rebekah WallerSynopsis: High-tech greenhouses in hot-desert regions rely on carbon dioxide enrichment to boost crop yields, but current liquid CO₂ supply chains are costly and emissions-intensive. This study evaluates adsorption-based DAC systems—temperature-vacuum-swing (TVSA) and moisture-swing (MSA)—as on-site alternatives for CO₂ supply. Integrated techno-economic and life-cycle analysis shows that DAC-based enrichment can match conventional costs while reducing lifecycle emissions by eliminating transport-related CO₂. Performance is most sensitive to electricity price, carbon intensity, and sorbent efficiency. When powered by low-carbon solar electricity, DAC-enabled greenhouses offer a lower-emission and potentially cost-competitive pathway for sustainable high-yield agriculture in arid environments.
Authors: Emilia Jankowska, Matthew Sclafani, Bonnie X. Chang et al.Synopsis: Marine enhanced rock weathering (mERW) using minerals like olivine is being explored as a carbon dioxide removal strategy that could also reduce ocean acidification, benefiting calcifying organisms such as oysters. This study presents results from the first field trial of mERW, examining oyster growth and trace metal accumulation over short and long timeframes. Oysters exposed to olivine showed no significant differences in biomass compared to controls, and metal concentrations remained low and within safe natural ranges. Overall, the findings suggest that olivine-based mERW has limited biological impacts on oysters while posing no detectable human health risks under the conditions tested.
Authors: Dominik Steinberger-Maierhofer, Nicolas Alaux, Delphine Ramon, Semjon Popek et al.Synopsis: This study quantifies CO₂ storage and uptake in EU buildings across material, building, and building-stock scales, comparing bio-based materials and mineral carbonation against sector emissions. Results show that bio-based materials provide the largest net carbon storage at the building level, while mineral carbonation effects are partly offset by production-stage emissions, leading to net-positive emissions overall. At the EU-27 stock level, biogenic materials contribute only modest net storage (about 1.27% of embodied emissions), while mineral processes increase emissions by around 10.16%, indicating limited net removal potential in current construction systems.
Authors: Tatjana Zurbriggen, Nicoletta Brazzola, Adrian Odenweller, Falko Ueckerdt & Joeri RogeljSynopsis: DAC is increasingly viewed as essential for net-zero pathways, but its ability to scale to climate-relevant levels depends strongly on early deployment dynamics rather than long-term demand alone. This study uses probabilistic diffusion modelling based on historical analogs such as ammonia synthesis and LNG to project DAC growth to 2050. Results show that without rapid early expansion, DAC is likely to remain at megaton scale, while gigaton-scale removal is only achievable under strong policy support and accelerated growth. The findings emphasize that near-term capacity building is the key determinant of long-term DAC impact.
Authors: Celina Scott-BuechlerSynopsis: Public attitudes toward CDR governance in the United States strongly favor democratic oversight, community involvement, and public accountability. A nationally representative survey shows that most respondents support mandatory local consultation, with many also favoring community ownership or voting stakes in CDR projects, and public ownership being preferred over private control by a 2:1 margin. Support for CDR is influenced by who endorses it, increasing with environmental NGO backing and decreasing with fossil fuel company involvement. While concerns include cost, effectiveness, and industry motives, many respondents also associate CDR with job creation and improved air quality, highlighting the importance of governance design in shaping public acceptance.
Authors: Kohei Kurokawa, Atsushi Nakao, Kazuki Azuma, Hodaka Tomita, Katashi Kubo, Kazuki Nomura, Junta YanaiSynopsis: ERW removes atmospheric CO₂ by applying crushed silicate rocks to soils, but direct evidence of in-soil mineral dissolution has been limited. This study uses quantitative X-ray powder diffraction to track basalt mineral changes in cropland over a 2.5-month buckwheat cultivation period with basalt application. Results show significant depletion of key minerals—especially pyroxene and bytownite—in plant root zones, confirming active weathering. Estimated CO₂ removal reached up to 7.2 tCO₂ per hectare over the study period. The findings provide direct mineral-level evidence of ERW and demonstrate a method for improved monitoring, reporting, and verification of soil-based carbon removal.
Authors: Anna-Adriana Anschütz, Thomas Neumann, Peter Holtermann, Hagen RadtkeSynopsis: This study tests hydrodynamic model reliability using passive tracer simulations in the Baltic Sea Gotland Deep across different model configurations and resolutions. Results show large variability in predicted vertical transport, which significantly affects estimates of how quickly alkalinity reaches the surface and enables CO₂ uptake. The findings highlight that even well-calibrated ocean models can produce divergent outcomes, underscoring the need for dedicated validation of transport processes when modelling OAE and similar marine applications.
Authors: Kerryn Brent, Lennart Bach, Andrew Lenton, et al.Synopsis: Marine climate interventions (mCIs) include ocean-based carbon dioxide removal strategies and solar radiation management approaches aimed at supporting climate mitigation and protecting marine ecosystems. This paper assesses how research into these technologies should advance over the coming decade in Australia, emphasizing the technical, social, and governance barriers that must be addressed. It identifies three key priorities: expanding mCI research, strengthening monitoring, reporting and verification systems, and developing inclusive governance frameworks that engage affected communities and First Nations groups. These steps are framed as essential for informing future decisions on whether and how mCIs could be deployed in national climate policy.
Authors: Robert Fofrich Navarro, Alcen Chiu, Elsa M OrdwaySynopsis: This study shows that large shares of major bioenergy crops such as oil palm, sugarcane, and soybean will be exposed to climate conditions beyond their historical safe climate space by 2060, particularly in tropical regions. Such exposure could significantly reduce bioenergy yield and carbon sequestration potential, with possible declines of up to 67% for oil palm under limited adaptation. The results also highlight a trade-off: expanding cultivation to offset losses could lead to major carbon and biodiversity losses from land-use change, potentially undermining overall climate benefits.
Authors: James A Gately, Sylvia M Kim, Zoe S Welch, et al.Synopsis: OAE is a carbon dioxide removal approach that increases seawater alkalinity to enhance natural carbon uptake, but its ecological effects remain uncertain. This study tests large, abrupt alkalinity additions in outdoor microcosms using limestone-inspired and NaOH inputs. Results show shifts in microbial communities, reduced diversity, and increased parasitic organisms under low nutrients. Findings suggest potential ecosystem disruption near deployment sites and highlight the need for careful risk assessment before scaling OAE.
Authors: Minseok Im, Konan Alain Cedric Nzisso, Inhye Kim, Cheol Hun Park, Sunghyun ChoSynopsis: This paper proposes a novel DAC system integrated with a chlor–alkali (CA) process, called CADAC, which supplies Ca(OH)₂ directly to the DAC unit and removes the need for an energy-intensive calciner–slaker loop. Technoeconomic and life cycle analysis show improved profitability, with net gains of 18.0–35.1 million USD per year and a substantially lower levelized cost of carbon capture, even becoming revenue-generating in many scenarios. Environmental results indicate up to 72.7% reduction in global warming potential compared to standalone CA operations, with potential carbon-negative performance when renewable electricity exceeds 44.3%.
Authors: Zonglin Shi, Yan Wang, Xiaoshuang Li, Na Zhang, Sisi Li, Yue Wang, et al.Synopsis: Wetland vegetation type strongly controls how soil organic carbon (SOC) is stored, transformed, and stabilized in surface soils. This study across Hengshui Lake wetland shows that reed marshes store the most carbon due to anaerobic conditions and strong aggregate protection, while woodlands enhance dissolved and microbial carbon through active microbial processing. In contrast, farmland and wasteland accelerate carbon breakdown and loss due to rapid labile carbon turnover. Differences in bacterial and fungal communities are primarily driven by soil moisture and bulk density, highlighting how vegetation shifts shape distinct carbon sequestration pathways and wetland carbon sink potential.
Authors: Yibiao Zou, Gabriel Reuben Smith, Thomas Lauber, Joe Wan, Haozhi Ma, Noel Gorelick, Constantin M. Zohner & Thomas W. CrowtherSynopsis: An analysis of 17 million forest patches in the conterminous USA shows that larger, contiguous forests are substantially more productive per unit area, with a hectare in very large forests being about 38% more productive than in isolated patches. This fragmentation effect has already reduced national forest carbon uptake by an estimated 0.16 GtC per year (14%). Patch size emerges as a stronger predictor of productivity than soil or topography, and global data show similar trends, emphasizing fragmentation as a critical but often overlooked factor in climate mitigation planning.
Authors: Qianrong Ma, Jiayi Mu, Yingxiao Sun, Zhiwei Zhu, Siyan Dong, Leibin Wang, et al.Synopsis: CDR may not fully reverse humid heat stress, even under net-negative emissions scenarios. This study of China finds that humid heat responds asymmetrically during warming and cooling, with only partial recovery as temperatures decline. The persistence of heat stress is driven by uneven changes in temperature and humidity, along with atmospheric circulation patterns that continue to transport moisture and sustain high heat conditions. As a result, more than 0.2 billion people could remain exposed to severe humid heat, with most of the impact arising from hysteresis effects, highlighting limits to reversibility and the need for adaptation alongside mitigation.
Authors: Hussain M. Almajed, Bri-Mathias Hodge, Wilson A. SmithSynopsis: Bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) combined with DAC and direct ocean capture (DOC) is evaluated as a carbon removal pathway under variable power conditions. The study finds a key trade-off between system size and energy intensity: DAC-BPMED requires smaller membrane area but operates at much higher current densities than DOC-BPMED. As a result, DAC systems are more sensitive to operating costs, while DOC systems are more capital-intensive. Estimated costs range from US$304–1,281/tCO₂ for DAC-BPMED and US$535–2,220/tCO₂ for DOC-BPMED, with potential cost reductions from by-product sales and feedstock concentration.
Authors: Benedict S Probst , Florian EgliSynopsis: Carbon-crediting systems are increasingly central to net-zero strategies, but concerns over low environmental integrity and weak market signals are limiting the scale-up of durable CDR. This paper argues that improving standards and monitoring alone is insufficient, and that a new financing architecture is needed to unlock investment in permanent CDR. It proposes a tiered auction framework that sets explicit removal targets, enforces minimum quality criteria, and uses reverse auctions alongside first-of-a-kind funding to stabilize prices and reduce investment risk. The approach is designed to accelerate deployment of high-integrity carbon removal technologies by improving market certainty and financial viability.
Authors: Pradeep Marula Siddappanavara and Jayashree PSynopsis: Mangrove ecosystems are increasingly used as Blue Carbon assets in climate mitigation strategies, but current carbon accounting frameworks often assume long-term carbon permanence without adequately accounting for climate-driven risks. This review highlights how acute disturbances, chronic sea-level rise, and combined coastal stressors can destabilize stored carbon in mangroves. It identifies a gap between scientific understanding of ecosystem vulnerability and market-based crediting standards, which often overlook future climate hazards. To address this, the paper proposes shifting from static carbon stock accounting to a climate-secure framework that incorporates site-specific risk assessments and stability scoring to improve the integrity of Blue Carbon credits.
Authors: Ella Hughes, Zeke Hausfather, Randall Spock, Christopher Van ArsdaleSynopsis: This paper argues that achieving net-zero requires combining emissions abatement with carbon dioxide removal strategies that operate over different time horizons. Because mitigation options affect climate warming on distinct timescales, the authors propose an accounting framework called “sustained warming neutralization,” which converts emissions and mitigation impacts into a unified metric based on continuous global mean surface temperature change. This approach aims to ensure that emissions are fully compensated in both the near and long term, supporting more robust and time-consistent net-zero claims and guiding the design of mitigation portfolios aligned with global temperature stabilization goals.
Authors: Qi Zuo, Jian Cao, Mengying ZhaoSynopsis: Climate mitigation strategies such as CDR and radiation management (RM) can reduce global temperatures, but they produce uneven regional impacts on monsoon rainfall. Using a climate model, this study compares how different approaches affect monsoon systems across Asia, North America, and North Africa. Results show that global cooling generally weakens monsoon rainfall in Asia and the Southern Hemisphere, while increasing rainfall in the North American monsoon region. In North Africa, outcomes depend strongly on the specific mitigation method, with CDR reducing rainfall and RM approaches increasing it. These contrasting responses are driven by changes in atmospheric circulation and temperature gradients, highlighting that temperature mitigation may redistribute rather than uniformly improve water availability.
Adsorption-based DAC-E alternatives compared to trucked liquid-CO 2 enrichment (Source)WEB POSTSShare REPORTSUPCOMING EVENTSJune 2026We have curated a “Carbon Removal Events Calendar.” Explore and stay informed about upcoming events, conferences, and webinars on Carbon Dioxide Removal technology. Sync specific events / all events to your default calendar to ensure you never miss out on important CDR updates. Carbon Removal Events Calendar Add our Carbon Removal Events Calendar to your default calendar in 2 ways:Sync specific event: Click the event → menu (≡) → Share → choose your calendar → Save.Or sync all events: Menu (≡) → Preferences → iCalendar Feeds → Copy URL → Add to your calendar settings → Subscribe.JOB OPPORTUNITIES“Carbon Removal Canada is dedicated to advancing inclusive policies and innovations to scale up carbon removal.”
“Arbor’s advanced power systems deliver clean, reliable baseload electricity with zero operating emissions—modular, fuel-flexible, and engineered for the realities of today’s energy demand. At the core is a supercritical CO₂ turbine with integrated carbon capture, designed to bring carbon-neutral power online quickly at meaningful scale.”
“CarbonCure Technologies is a fast-growing carbon utilization technology company on a mission to reduce embodied carbon in new concrete construction.”
“Charm Industrial’s mission is to return the atmosphere to 280 ppm CO₂. We convert excess inedible biomass into carbon-rich bio-oil and inject it into underground storage for permanent carbon removal.”
“Brineworks is building the electrolyzer of the future — a patented system that powers ultra-low-cost Direct Air Capture using intermittent renewables and low-cost abundant materials.”
“Mitti Labs is building the infrastructure layer to scale climate-smart rice farming — starting with high-integrity, methane-reduction carbon credits.”
“Rubicon Carbon is a next-generation carbon credit firm. Led by a world-class management team, Rubicon Carbon is an innovative platform that channels capital to unlock at-scale decarbonization projects and delivers trusted, enterprise-grade solutions for carbon credit purchases.”
“Alt Carbon is a deeptech science and data company, building agri-infrastructure for climate action. We aim to make South Asia a hub for Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) through technology pathways like Enhanced Rock Weathering and Biochar.”
“Symbiosis Coalition is an advance market commitment by Microsoft, Meta, Google, Salesforce, McKinsey, Bain and REI to accelerate the next generation of high-integrity nature-based carbon removal.”
“Skytree enables a transition to a world with cleaner Air for everyone. We do this by developing and deploying smart technology that captures atmospheric carbon dioxide, enabling its use or storage to combat climate change and aid society and businesses around the world.”
“Greenlyte is reshaping the global fuel economy with our novel, IP-protected, direct air capture to fuels technology, which shows superior economic potential compared to existing approaches, even reaching fossil prices.”
“Deepsink is a commercial agency dedicated to accelerating the commercial development of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) companies.”
“Isometric is the world’s leading carbon removal registry. We help Fortune 100 companies tackle climate change and avoid greenwashing.”
Looking for your dream job in CDR? There are 573 jobs available *right now*: check them all out at: CDRjobs Board PODCASTS“In this episode, @geoengineering1 speaks with Ahmed El-Sayed of Viridas Technologies, a company aiming to revolutionize Direct Air Capture (DAC) by redesigning the process from the ground up, including the fan system itself.The conversation explores why DAC remains expensive, largely due to the extremely low concentration of CO2 in ambient air. While most research focuses on developing new solvents and materials to reduce energy use, Ahmed argues that the thermodynamic limits of capture efficiency may already have been reached. Instead, Viridas is pursuing a different strategy i.e. increasing the volume of air processed.Their proposed high-pressure system reduces contactor size by 70x while delivering more than 3100x better performance through major gains in absorption capacity and absorption rate. Ahmed also discusses the use of scalable, oxygen-resistant solvents derived from widely produced industrial chemicals, and why the future of DAC may depend on breakthroughs in turbomachinery and membrane technologies to drive costs down to ultra-low levels and enable gigaton-scale deployment.Paper Discussed: Elsayed, A., & Alawadh, T. (2026). Scaling Carbon Removal to Gigaton Capacity using Pressurized Direct Air Capture. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15002130/v1
“Joining us in today’s episode is Diego Justiniano, CEO and founder of carbon removal company and the world’s largest biochar supplier Exomad Green. Diego shared the company’s journey to its latest milestone of 2.3 million tonnes of CDR credits sold and over 300,000 tonnes delivered, and stressed the importance of understanding that carbon removal requires a hands-on approach to achieve industrial scale.”
“What do you think of a developer who pitches a carbon dioxide removal buyer as they are coming out of the restroom? Or can’t even enjoy some friendly scones while we all get caffeinated? Or interrupt conversations with business cards?! Forgetting that buyers are people with names and feelings and limited social energy is a tough look to beat.At a recent Carbon Unbound in Vancouver, today’s guest—Taylor Insley, the Director of Strategic Planning for Terraset—was on a panel that made a splash: she was telling developers, basically, that the way many of them approach buyers is counterproductive.I wanted to talk to Taylor because she sits in an unusual position. She spent most of her career as a fundraiser, soliciting donors for causes she cares about. Now at Terraset, the turntables have turned. She’s the recipient of pitches for tax-deductible and highly catalytic CDR and other climate interventions. And that perspective shift has taught her something about what works and what doesn’t that I think is genuinely useful for anyone trying to raise money in this space.But this episode also goes somewhere uncomfortable. We talk about fairness. About whether it should matter that you’re charming and diplomatic, or whether the science and economics should be all that counts. About status and in-groups and the fundamental hypocrisy of caring about relationships when you’re on one side of the table and resenting them when you’re on the other. I brought in the Chinese Imperial Exam, The Godfather, Love on the Spectrum, whether dogs are communists or private property lovers depending upon who has food... It was a lot, but I think we successfully got to the core of this topic.”
“Recorded on May 6th at Zurich’s first-ever Climate Week, this is a different kind of episode. Sebastian Manhart and Eve Tamme spent the day inside a series of Swiss government-hosted events on international CDR pilot transfers and brought the microphones with them.The Switzerland-Norway and Switzerland-Sweden pilots are quietly doing something that almost no one else is: actually testing the full Article 6 machinery for durable CDR transfers, end to end, with real private sector partners at the table. The question is what that process is revealing: about what works, what doesn’t, and how far the rest of the world is from being able to follow.Eve and Sebastian got to sit down with two people instrumental in making these pilots happen: Veronika Elgart, Deputy Head of International Climate Policy at Switzerland’s Federal Office for the Environment, and Ane Gjengedal, Senior Adviser at the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. The surprises are real and so are the unresolved tensions around: use cases, corresponding adjustments, and the gap between having regulation on paper and having markets that function.The honest answer from everyone in the room: this is harder than it looks, it’s taking longer than expected, and starting sooner is the only advice that holds across every jurisdiction.”
“The European Commission just published a draft implementing act on CBAM and it quietly opens the door to international carbon credits counting toward carbon border liabilities. The rules are still being written, but the direction of travel is clear.Co-hosts Sebastian Manhart and Eve Tamme pulled our favourite CBAM expert, Dan Maleski back in for a rapid-fire debrief the day after publication. They wanted to get the Scoop on what’s actually in the act, what’s still missing, and what does it mean in practice for companies, governments, and CDR?The conversation unpacks the 10% cap on Article 6 credits, why domestic credits face no equivalent limit, and why that asymmetry should raise eyebrows. Dan also flags a real risk: with prices in voluntary carbon markets anything but standardised, the room for manipulation is not hypothetical. And with “independent persons” as the main safeguard, the jury is still out on how watertight this will be.One thread runs through it all: CBAM is pushing trading partners toward compliance regimes that look more like the EU ETS and for CDR project developers who can align with that compliance demand, the long-term signal is significant.The consultation closes in early June. While still unresolved, this one is worth watching closely.”
“In this episode: Dr. Christian Komor, climate author and Earth systems strategist, joins Net Zero Compare to discuss why carbon removal should be treated as climate infrastructure rather than a peripheral technology.The conversation explores one of the central debates in long-term net-zero strategy: whether emissions reduction alone is enough to manage climate risk. Dr. Komor argues that accumulated atmospheric carbon, climate feedback loops, and slow policy response make large-scale carbon removal increasingly urgent. He explains direct air carbon removal, carbon utilization, and the importance of pairing removal facilities with clean energy. A key focus is his SkyCarbon Blueprint, a proposed state-led model for scaling direct atmospheric carbon removal in Colorado through public-private financing, co-located renewable energy, industrial carbon use, and interstate coordination. The episode also examines cost, policy, resilience, public will, and the role of companies while regulation remains uncertain. Ultimately, the discussion highlights that a credible climate strategy may need to combine emissions reduction, carbon removal, adaptation, better data, and systems-level planning.”
YOUTUBE VIDEOSEarth-Powered Carbon Removal: How Geothermal Energy Can Capture CO₂ & Fight Climate Change | Airmobilityinfra Private Limited “What if the Earth itself could help remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? In this video, we explore the powerful combination of Geothermal Energy and Direct Air Capture (DAC) technology — a breakthrough solution for sustainable carbon removal and clean energy generation. Discover how geothermal heat can drastically reduce the energy cost of capturing CO₂, enabling a reliable, scalable, and low-carbon pathway toward net-zero emissions. From binary geothermal power plants to thermal regeneration systems, this video explains how underground energy resources could become a game-changing climate solution for the future of our planet.”
The Role of Indigenous Leadership in Carbon Removal | Carbon Removal Canada “Indigenous communities aren’t just stakeholders in carbon removal. They’re leaders, knowledge holders, and decision-makers shaping what this sector looks like and who it works for.In this episode, we sit down with Indigenous leaders working at the intersection of land, climate, and carbon removal to hear directly from them: what’s working, what needs to change, and what responsible carbon removal looks like when Indigenous peoples are in the driver’s seat.”
Dr. Christian Komor on Climate Urgency, Policy, and the Limits of Incremental Action | Net Zero Compare “ In this episode: Dr. Christian Komor joins Net Zero Compare to discuss why carbon removal should be treated as climate infrastructure, not as a peripheral or future climate technology.”
From Field to Credits: Inside the World’s First Second-Year Enhanced Rock Weathering Credit Issuance | InPlanet - Measurable. Scalable. Certified Credits “In this webinar, we’ll walk through real-world results from InPlanet’s tropical field project in Brazil, including CO₂ sequestration rates, MRV evolution, and insights from a second crediting cycle. We’ll also explore what this means for carbon markets in 2026, and how ERW is creating value beyond carbon through soil health, crop productivity, and supply chain resilience.”
CO2LOGIX: First-order model of pressure-constrained CO2 geological storage growth at the basin scale | CMCC Channel “This session is dedicated to recent publications on CDR research, will focus on the paper CO2LOGIX: A first-order model of pressure-constrained CO2 geological storage growth at the basin scale.”
Responsible Business Practices Building Credible CDR Strategies | The Gold Standard Foundation “Organisations everywhere are under pressure to move beyond ambition and deliver real climate and nature impacts. Gold Standard’s quarterly Responsible Business Practices webinar series helps organisations set and check their direction so they can act confidently, reduce uncertainty and deliver credible sustainability outcomes.Each quarter, we navigate the evolving landscape of climate and nature action. Participants will learn about the latest trends, case studies and resources that show what meaningful responsibility looks like in practice. This quarter’s webinar focused on building credible CDR strategies and how to navigate this evolving landscape with Kaya Axelsson of Oxford Net Zero.”
Weekly Carbon Removal Updates from 11 May - 17 May 2026 | Carbon Removal Updates BulletinDEADLINESFollow us on:Twitter | Bluesky | LinkedIn | YouTube | Substack | Podcast 1 | Podcast 2
Support us here:Support This Newsletter Share Carbon Removal Updates Leave a comment © 2026 Carbon Removal Updates
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe 
| |
  |
|
