https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-026-01488-4
Authors: Ilai Guendelman, Ivan Mitevski & Gabriel Vecchi
23 July 2026
Abstract
Apparent hydrological sensitivity, the change in global-mean precipitation per degree of surface warming, is an important metric of the climate response to radiative forcing. While previous studies have suggested that hydrological sensitivity is approximately constant with increasing CO2 concentrations, here we show that this behavior does not hold when comparing increases and decreases of CO2 concentrations. Using idealized climate model experiments with abrupt CO2 halving and doubling from pre-industrial (PI) conditions, we find that the apparent hydrological sensitivity is higher for CO2 halving, indicating an asymmetry between CO2 halving and doubling. This asymmetry arises almost entirely from the fast atmospheric adjustment, whereas the slow, temperature-mediated component remains nearly symmetric. A decomposition of the fast adjustment shows that the response in longwave radiative cooling, particularly its clear-sky component, is a primary contributor to the asymmetry. Applying this framework to abrupt carbon dioxide removal (CDR) simulations highlights the role of the fast adjustments in the previously reported hysteresis in CO2 ramp-up and then ramp-down transient simulations. Moreover, a weaker but statistically significant asymmetry, analogous to that found in PI-based CO2 doubling and halving, persists in the CDR abrupt simulation.
Source: Npj