Thanks Andrew.
The heat and bibliometric mapping here, I think could be of some
significant use in outreach. This review of carbon efficient or
negative materials is quite exhaustive, or exhaustive enough to
get across the concept that our climate culture has bitten off
more than it can chew, in time frames that matter. Materials and
their embodied carbon footprints are what define our climate
culture's quest to decarbonize. It has long been an assumption of
many that this quest is folly for some reason or another and this
is likely a true assumption, but our climate culture ignores it
almost entirely.
These two graphics are way to show the vast complications of
decarbonization; that "later is too late," and we need to "buy
time" with far simpler concepts of industrial CDR and
geoengineering so that decarbonization has the time needed to
become effective.
Cheers,
B
Kharissova et al., Carbon negative footprint materials - A
review, Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects, February 2024.
(Abstract)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352507X24000118?via%3Dihub
(Full - Researchgate free account required)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377908427_Carbon_negative_footprint_materials_A_review
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Carbon Dioxide Removal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to CarbonDioxideRem...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/CAHJsh9-p2adXRatatGZq7MxeHg0oCUa_Q2q5NCCVUsY5tsV5SQ%40mail.gmail.com.